What's your point, anon? He worked for Trump for 3 whole months, begging to get on for free in fact, then stabbed Trump in the back and got fired for it. As >>6011942 points out, he's now in prison where he belongs, but only after selling out the people he actually worked for, the Podestas.
The dude in the twats is probably right. The bummer about that, of
course, is that I don't believe FISA output can be used for criminal
prosecutions. It certainly would help in other ways, I'm sure. Maybe
a lawfag can help on this.
Not sure where you've been, but there has been no FISA evidence used
in any prosecution. Used to start other investigations, maybe, but
not for prosecutions directly.
That's what I was thinking. They can't use it directly but they
can use it to confirm other evidence or something like that.
You know what's interesting is that the media downplayed his "habits" while he was in office
but suddenly it's getting traction. They couldn't point it out when it would tarnish Obama, but
they sure as hell don't care now.
External, not internal. For foreigners, not US citzens. If it was opened on all the others, two
hops from wherever it was started, it can't be used. So basically, you're agreeing with me. I'm not mistaken.
Because there are enough people in the world that think because it's healthcare
somehow there's a way to make the law of supply and demand work differently. The
lawmakers likely know better, but they make so much off of it themselves they
simply don't care and take advantage of everyone as a result.
> they can collect on me, you and your boss.
And they can't use that against you or your boss, but they can do parallel
construction as the other anon pointed out.
That's the whole point of unmasking, in fact. Citizens that aren't interacting
with foreign agents are required by law to be "masked."
What on earth are you talking about? The F means FOREIGN. That's the ONLY point of FISA.
So damn much misinformation running around. If there's any hope of all this it's that maybe
people wake up to the law and learn how to
make it better.
Not if they aren't involving foreign actors. That's simply not true. Unless you can point to the section of the statute that says so.
>FISC
The point of FISC is not internal, it is for people working with foreign agents.
I'm not arguing against why they are keeping them open, just what can be
used in court.
A judge just ruled it unconstitutional, the whole thing. Go back to reddit concernfag.
You're stinking up the joint.
Now that's a better explanation, anon. It's not clear from the text of
the law (that I've read). In this case, the illegal FISA itself is the
predicate for everything else - if I understand what you're saying.
I had diverged slightly wondering (out loud obviously) what could be
used and the assertions that citizens are the target is plainly wrong.
Being able to open up a FISA and collect on me, then get evidence
on me and my boss is also incorrect. A legitimate FISA warrant
requires that infringement on citizen rights is minimal, as I read it.