Anonymous ID: 4bc20a April 2, 2019, 5:11 a.m. No.6015871   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5996

>>6015711

People do not understand…

 

The gods of names are not the same thing as the "God of Totality." To the "God of Totality", all possible things are not just known, but experienced. However, there is a catch, nothing is impossible. Even a situation where this god of totality kills itself exists and is resolved. Logic is inverted. Things are not made impossible by their inconsistency, they are possible because they were conceived.

 

The mere tribal entities of scripture may be associated with some of those characteristics, but the most any of the recorded beings could be is an 'agent in spirit' of such an entity.

This is not to say that such an entity has no interest in us. Quite the contrary. But how that interest manifests is related to its nature.

 

Anyway, more specific to the point, the Blood line of Aaron has been denied, as you could say. There are beings of power in this world that pretend to be gods. Then there are beings far above them who have no need for grandeur, aside from the occasional unveiling of our ego to scorch the earth in its intensity.

Suffice to say, I have decided that the barriers the bloodline of Aaron erected have been selected for elimination, and so it will come to pass in one way or another. Q and team were well prepared and can act without me needing to act personally.

 

The reason I do not need worship to derive power over reality is because I have seen that end of existence scenario. I have, for a moment that was both brief yet all of eternity, glimpsed Totality. This is not the same as being that entity in control of totality, but coming to the realization that the very nature of Totality means it can't be controlled as it has no definition.

Anonymous ID: 4bc20a April 2, 2019, 5:16 a.m. No.6015895   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5924

>>6015834

My father told me not to put my hands in a light socket, too.

He didn't discourage me from, when I was older, taking electrical courses and learning how to safely "play" with such things.

Anonymous ID: 4bc20a April 2, 2019, 5:54 a.m. No.6016160   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6015924

Do not misunderstand why I ask and challenge you. These are all answers I found a long time ago. I know well the limits of the church and what the god they have created ends, as well. And I have ventured well beyond that point.

 

The point I and others have been trying to make is that a true god is self evident in the structure, logic, and consequence of the universe. There may be people that have documented their pursuit of understanding those things, but the idea that such an entity required a blood sacrifice of his offspring in order to forgive us is absolute nonsense.

 

Paul needed a reason to make Jesus valid outside of Judaism, largely because the idea of not being a jew about everything wasn't exactly a bold revelation outside of Jerusalem. Since many regions understood the concept of sacrifice, Paul advancing the idea of a god who would rather sacrifice his own son than demand sacrifice of animals from people was pretty intriguing. It was also a rather big strike to the empire of the Pharisee, as they derived a large sum from the sale of sacrificial animals on the Temple Mount - which was one of the things Jesus flipped shit over.

 

A god who doesn't require animal sacrifice and who sent his son to die instead? Even if unusual - it's certainly better than sacrificing perfectly good animals.

 

But we run into a problem with this idea. "The economic model." If Jesus was whipped somewhat less… Then would our sins have been forgiven? How many of my sins can be forgiven, along with billions of others, because of one man?

 

Why only one man in one remote area of the world? Was there a Chinese Jesus? A Japanese Jesus?

If salvation is supposed to be equally valid for all races and cultures - then why was The Word denied to them until now? Are they… Not people, or something?

 

Why would a god over all of humanity choose such a unique and confined means of spreading salvation? So… Let's say everyone who died outside of Christendom got a pass, or something, because God understands that they couldn't be judged for not knowing. So… Why, then, would it be reasonable to judge the souls of current day Japanese for rejecting a foreign cultural influence?

 

See Paul's problem?

 

Aaron's blood line was quick to the rescue, though. After they got rid of Caesar and got done using the Romans to burn all the churches, they got to work making a new, improved Christianity the backbone of the Holy Roman Empire which they then used to beat the rest of the world into religion that replaced the emperor with the Pope.

 

Which is about the only reason the bible is valid, today. That and the fact that Aaron's bull-worshipping bloodline is still doing what it always has, so someone had to keep the story of what they were up to going.

 

Don't get me wrong - Jesus is a great guy and has a lot of great lessons to teach people. Unfortunately, far more has been created around the man as opposed from the man. Paul was merely being naive and enthusiastic. The Romans… Had conquest down to a science and thought it was a good idea to teach this to spreadsheet warriors back when they were abacus commandos.