>>601963

because of why he has to say it in the first place (human nature/decades of conditioning to worship leaders, etc)

>>601984

very annoying indeed, but comparatively pretty innocent compared to most slides/distractions/toxic posts etc.

no hope here of changing that, more time spent/wasted trying to control/herd than just moving on/ignoring those that can't be bothered with the very basics of decorum/posting.

part of why the harsh chan culture has its advantages (make normies afraid to post again)

>>602062

well, that's obviously not their plan… seems to me they're going for something much more organic, much deeper.

also it just makes more sense not to reveal the clean-up of things that are going on unseen while it's happening, that's just asking for trouble/complications.

>>602113

a baker should be able to understand the functionality/convenience advantages of using dedicated threads without throwing fucksticks around.

It's not about being "divided" (gtfo shia) when it's threads on the same damn board

>>602125

guys, where you been? Tons and tons of people have a fixation on 11:11 (and repeating digits in general).

Duckduckgo the BillHicks sketches on "you are not special"

>>602173

https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limited_hangout

>>602186

so sick of the "same person" fallacy.

real life is not starwars

assets can just be assets

people often look like other people (i for one must have at least a dozen perfect doppelgangers, and that's just the approx. number of people that told me about it, could be way more still)

>>602228

wut? i'm just saying the constant search "method" of juxtaposing pics to try and find out some person is the same as another is really mostly dumb, has little chance of ever being proof of anything, and is quite clearly a perversion of real research/caricature of actual truthers, as were 9/11 lazers or flaturfers or the like

>>602229

i'd love to give you more than a you but for that i'd have to understand how your post makes any sense at all, Ciao!

>>602401

just another not to trust the old attention hog, then

>>602443

and CHINA works for UK…

>>602461

>Has Q talked about VJ at all.

looks like someone's due to re-read crumbs

>>602478

ah i see, maybe not related to that pic, then. Same look is fine, i guess.

maybe i fired too soon, but the "same person" quest/fallacy is a constant cancer (here and "conspiracy" research in general) and i'm so sick of it

>>602569

burn your harddrive

>>602604

phew, use the Spoiler function please

>>602633

When any truth not following the presribed narrative is "fake news", well then it's no surprise that falsity wins out'…

>>602679

so much reasons/leads converge…

but HEY, look at these AXIL OF EVIL countries instead, pay no attention to the Swiss curtain

>>602703

people know spies/secret services exist.

they don't know what they do exactly.

people know secret societies exist.

they don't know what they do exactly.

people have no clue how many links/connections there are between the two.

and yet expect to have a clue what's really going on in the world…