>>601634

Anon, this is GENERAL RESEARCH... you are free and encouraged to post here about ANY of Q's drops. You don't have to go along with the crowd and focus all energies on one topic. We have a lot to work on. When a topic gets too big and overruns General Research, it's not helpful to the solving the bigger picture and should get it's own separate board.

Do #InternetBillofRights and Snowden have their own separate boards to work in yet? These topics are clogging General Research

>>601946

>>601956

Why do so many still do it if Q distinctly told us not to?

>>601960

From the 99.9% of Q's other drops.

>>601972

It's counterproductive to have everyone saying "oh hi Q" everytime there is a drop… or "Q, can you clear up the alien things for us"

>>601973

This should go on an IBOR separate board. This is General Research

>>601988

no namefags

The tide is turning in /r/worldnews

Florida Paper: Sheriff Scott Israel Stonewalling Release of Parkland Surveillance Video

breitbart.com/big-

government/2018/03/09/florida-paper-sheriff-scott-israel-stonewalling-release-parkland-surveillance-video/

>>602206

You're the first person I've heard talk about them being the same person

Sydney Airport is refusing to reveal the "technical issue" that left passengers stranded this morning. Airport cameras were completely disabled for 1hr. And this only affected people trying to leave the country.

Inbound international flights were unaffected. And domestic flights were also unaffected.

A passenger has stated "They announced that they had a power outage and so no one could go through border security". (sound familiar?)

But later on Sydney airport came out and stated they "could not reveal the exact nature of the technical issue…except to say that it was not a power outage or security issue but a system problem that temporarily rendered CCTV useless, and interrupted passenger processing, including security screening.

smh.com.au/ politics/nsw/no-explanation-for-sydney-airport-technical-issue-meltdown-20180309-p4z3n9.html

>>602296

I thought the implication of the side by side pics was that both had that mkultra look. it never occurred to me that they look alike. Do you think they do?

>>602354

We are not here for monetary gain, anon.

>>602450

At this point, she could by any company's stock and then decide to endorse their product to make money

Report: Former Vice President Joe Biden Preparing Another Run for President in 2020

breitbart.com/ big-government/2018/03/09/report-former-vice-president-joe-biden-preparing-another-run-president-2020/

>>602661

What's wrong? You never put your hand in the front pocket of another man's pants?