Anonymous ID: 9a7005 April 2, 2019, 12:57 p.m. No.6020662   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Chad Pergram is really trying to hammer down the fact that the SENATE is in the process of performing a "Mini Nuke" on process w/in the Senate….

 

Kinda sounds like a "Tactical Nuke" approach… reminds me of a Qdrop….

 

let's see…. Oh yeah, here it is…

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

2912

POTUS Tweets on Hillary & Democrats; Watch the Countdown (T Minus 18 Days Marker)

Q!!mG7VJxZNCI

1 Mar 2019 - 11:55:43 AM

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1101472084730003457

"Oh’ I see! Now that the 2 year Russian Collusion case has fallen apart, there was no Collusion except [bye] Crooked Hillary and the Democrats, they say, “gee, I have an idea, let’s look at Trump’s finances and every deal he has ever done. Let’s follow discredited Michael Cohen….."

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1101473899357880321

"…and the fraudulent and dishonest statements he made on Wednesday. No way, it’s time to stop this corrupt and illegally brought Witch Hunt. [Time to start looking at the other side where real crimes were committed]. Republicans have been [abused long enough]. Must end now!"

Carpet bombs are ok.

Tactical nukes are better.

[-21][-20][-19][-18]……….

Q

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1113157491720949761

Chad Pergram

‏

Verified account

 

@ChadPergram

Following Following @ChadPergram

More

A) On Senate "mini-nuke" option. Senate just had a failed cloture vote Invoking cloture ends debate in the Senate. And this is PRECISELY what Senate Republicans wanted in an effort to squeeze the time to confirm administration officials in a more expeditious fashion.

 

12:13 PM - 2 Apr 2019

_____________

https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1113157650039103488

 

Chad Pergram

‏

Verified account

 

@ChadPergram

Following Following @ChadPergram

More

B) It is said the Senate has unlimited debate. Not really. If the Senate has a failed cloture vote, nothing else can be debated at that moment. That’s what Senate GOPers need to try to establish a new PRECEDENT (not a rules change) to change post-cloture time for some nominees

 

12:13 PM - 2 Apr 2019

_________

https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1113157922215915523

 

Chad Pergram

‏

Verified account

 

@ChadPergram

Following Following @ChadPergram

More

C) Senate "suitcase nuke" option is a cousin of Nuclear Options I & II (2013 and 2017), which lowered the bar to break a filibuster from 60 votes to 51 for all nominees, including the Supreme Court. Lowers the post-cloture time from 30 hrs to 2 for many nominees.

 

12:15 PM - 2 Apr 2019

_________

https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1113158234066571265

 

Chad Pergram

‏

Verified account

 

@ChadPergram

Following Following @ChadPergram

More

D) Although the Senate tried to change a standing order (which needed 60 yeas to end a filibuster), it is easier to establish a new "precedent" in the Senate. The Senate does much of its business via "precedent." Establishing a new precedent only needs a simple majority

 

12:16 PM - 2 Apr 201

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Sounds very Tactical to me…