Oh fuck me! THIS is an interdasting volley of questioning by MR. BREITENBACH.

The crux of the questioning refers to the DOJ not willing to charge Clinton under statute 18 U.S.C. 793(f) [Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information] . HOWEVER, the FBI used this same statute to obtain a search warrant for Weiner's laptop.

Why were the DOJ and FBI in conflict about this statue? Was the DOJ bought and paid for by the infamous "tarmac meeting" or was someone at the FBI trying to obtain the Weiner laptop for its destruction of evidence or blackmail purposes?

I am sure the answer will be revealed eventually.

A lot of juicy bits in this Priestap testimony.

Meadows gets Priestap to admit that there was metadata indicating foreign access to Clinton's server, yet the FBI declined to prosecute for mishandling classified information under 18 U.S.C. 793(f) [Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information]

There were plenty of Clinton fans at the FBI and DOJ during the Obama administration