Anonymous (You) 04/02/19 (Tue) 14:57:10 9a7005 (1) No.6020662
==Chad Pergram is really trying to hammer down the fact that the SENATE is in the process of performing a "Mini Nuke" on process w/in the Senate….
Kinda sounds like a "Tactical Nuke" approach… reminds me of a Qdrop….==
let's see…. Oh yeah, here it is…
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2912
POTUS Tweets on Hillary & Democrats; Watch the Countdown (T Minus 18 Days Marker)
Q!!mG7VJxZNCI
1 Mar 2019 - 11:55:43 AM
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1101472084730003457
"Oh’ I see! Now that the 2 year Russian Collusion case has fallen apart, there was no Collusion except [bye] Crooked Hillary and the Democrats, they say, “gee, I have an idea, let’s look at Trump’s finances and every deal he has ever done. Let’s follow discredited Michael Cohen….."
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1101473899357880321
"…and the fraudulent and dishonest statements he made on Wednesday. No way, it’s time to stop this corrupt and illegally brought Witch Hunt. [Time to start looking at the other side where real crimes were committed]. Republicans have been [abused long enough]. Must end now!"
Carpet bombs are ok.
Tactical nukes are better.
[-21][-20][-19][-18]……….
Q
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1113157491720949761
Chad Pergram
‏
Verified account
@ChadPergram
Following Following @ChadPergram
More
A) On Senate "mini-nuke" option. Senate just had a failed cloture vote Invoking cloture ends debate in the Senate. And this is PRECISELY what Senate Republicans wanted in an effort to squeeze the time to confirm administration officials in a more expeditious fashion.
12:13 PM - 2 Apr 2019
_____
https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1113157650039103488
Chad Pergram
‏
Verified account
@ChadPergram
Following Following @ChadPergram
More
B) It is said the Senate has unlimited debate. Not really. If the Senate has a failed cloture vote, nothing else can be debated at that moment. That’s what Senate GOPers need to try to establish a new PRECEDENT (not a rules change) to change post-cloture time for some nominees
12:13 PM - 2 Apr 2019
_______
https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1113157922215915523
Chad Pergram
‏
Verified account
@ChadPergram
Following Following @ChadPergram
More
C) Senate "suitcase nuke" option is a cousin of Nuclear Options I & II (2013 and 2017), which lowered the bar to break a filibuster from 60 votes to 51 for all nominees, including the Supreme Court. Lowers the post-cloture time from 30 hrs to 2 for many nominees.
12:15 PM - 2 Apr 2019
_______
https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1113158234066571265
Chad Pergram
‏
Verified account
@ChadPergram
Following Following @ChadPergram
More
D) Although the Senate tried to change a standing order (which needed 60 yeas to end a filibuster), it is easier to establish a new "precedent" in the Senate. The Senate does much of its business via "precedent." Establishing a new precedent only needs a simple majority
12:16 PM - 2 Apr 201
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Sounds very Tactical to me…