Anonymous ID: 16cd60 April 2, 2019, 4:41 p.m. No.6023613   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6023518 pb

Not really.

Also, everything has to do with "Q" crumbs.

Everything is connected.

As If.

You supposedly have deciphered all the crumbs so can definitely say that what we study is "off topic?"

Baloney.

Anonymous ID: 16cd60 April 2, 2019, 4:52 p.m. No.6023756   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3768

>>6023660

comey's seems to be wavering of the "middle" line too

He's going fucking nuts!

maybe he thinks his daughter will save him

the tweet about "Dad" is weird.

As If:

Because he's a allegedly a "good Dad" [according to himself?] he can screw over our Country

Fuck off Comey

Anonymous ID: 16cd60 April 2, 2019, 5:12 p.m. No.6024034   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4233

>>6023926

Right it's a joke.

They are either paid or … just able to see the good when there is none.

Psychopaths are notorious for the ability to fool people; even experts in it.

He's got the "tells" though

Likely way over on the spectrum to "Red Flag"

"Red Tag" sociopath.

Anonymous ID: 16cd60 April 2, 2019, 5:20 p.m. No.6024161   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4177 >>4246 >>4276

>>6024116

Wow. why does it bother you so much

Why not do a rant on actual shills

The more your rant against it [for no reason that I can tell] the more I'm going to be motivated to post it

 

It's very sketchy how much bitterness this notice surfaces?

kek

 

"ATTN PRESS / MSM

 

When you see something that’s outrageous: before latching onto it you must first understand this is open to anyone. Posts are made to try and attribute the most outlandish and unrelated things to our work … intended to support the narrative that we are loons and discourage others from joining us. Use this tool to help spot this deception:

 

http://qresear.ch and type the exact text of a given subject and you will see it posted thousands of times. We aren’t idiots and don’t repeat a topic 24x7.

 

They don’t contribute to any active discussion, regardless of the gravity of the news. They also have much higher post counts, usually over 15. This is viewed as disrespectful to other anons, as there are limits on each thread to the number of replies.

 

Thus these ruses are easy to spot.

 

The most common are hateful towards a given group or what we call “slides” where it’s intended to distract from major news. These are entirely planted, and users are paid to do so. This board is not much different from any comment section on a site, and yes they get paid to “shape” opinion there too. The notion we can prevent something like this, when anyone can post anonymously, is a huge leap. We are busy with current events and research and filter them or ignore it. This isn’t one of your safe spaces, so if you can’t discern the difference, you shouldn’t be here.

 

Thanks For Playing, Come Again

 

TOGETHER WE ARE STRONG

 

DIVIDED WE ARE WEAK

 

WWG1WGA

 

For The Consideration Of The Press and Independent Journalists

 

Literally anyone can post literally anything here, and many do.

 

There are a few free-speaking anons here, along with a number of orchestrated shilling campaigns on behalf of a corrupt establishment. In the same way that Fusion GPS created the "Russia Dossier," organizations like ShareBlue, "MAGA Coalition," and others get paid to shape opinions and try to steer the narrative here. It is up to you as a journalist to discern whether a post accurately represents the free speech and fresh ideas of Q Research General or if it is a "shill narrative," posted to falsely associate QR and anons with entities or events.

 

It is important to understand that a free speech board cannot prevent false narratives from being posted anonymously, and it can be a huge leap in comprehending this place to know that.

 

The NOTABLES section can sometimes help cut through the chaos and noise. Notables aren’t endorsements. You must discern for yourself.

 

After being here for a while you might begin to see how you are being shilled in other communities, online or otherwise.

 

Lately we have seen MSM try to portray us as violent and full of hatred. There has even been evidence of “journalists” making fake posts themselves for a story. however, many anons consider that if a post is hate based, it is paid / fake.

 

NOTHING Q has said supports a hate-based narrative.