>>6029036 (lb)
Its those that have accepted Jesus Christ as their Messiah. Christians are the people of Moses, and the true Israel is the faith in Jesus Christ.
No.
I was replying to the person whom I asked who he thinks are the real Jews, and he told me that the Bible tells who they are.
I am giving that person my view on the matter.
Jesus spoke of the fake Jews, which are the Pharisees (which follow rabbinical Judaism), which are what the whole world calls "the Jews" at the present.
Pls tell sekrit.
This whole thing about Omar Ilham is so stupid.
She never should had been in the US, much less become a politician (Muslims don't belong in Western politics, there is no separation between Islam and Government), and she might be an anti-Semite (a true anti-Semite, someone who has a racial hatred of Jews) BUT WHAT SHE SAID about AIPAC (and what she said IS TRUE) does not make her an anti-Semite.
She is an anti-Semite because she hates racial Jews for their race, its not speaking some truths about AIPAC that make her an anti-Semite.
>their religion is filth
I think that both Islam and Judaism fall on that category due to the forced genital mutilation of children.
>THEY have no business in the west.
If you mean Muslims and religious Jews, I agree, I don't mind racial Jews thou. I think Muslims and religious Jews who are good people and pro-West (and I'm sure there are plenty going around) should abandon those ideologies if they want to live in the West.
I have some pretty good arguments for that, but I am not going to go into it rn.
>This is a set of distinctions society does not allow to be discussed.
Because it has been subverted in order to get people conditioned to accept that state of affairs.
This is why people need to speak out using LOGIC (LOGOS) in order to tear down at the subversive conditioning.
Yes, its a big can of worms, but one could argue that the bigger and wormier the can, the more urgent the opening is (although that depends on a lot of factors and on the context of the discussion, etc), but I kind of agree with you that it could just unravel in something not very productive on the bread rn, but allow me to make this observation on this subject: you were telling me that some people who are fake Jews spend their time here smearing real Jews and trying to make them look evil, and you're telling me that the fake Jews you speak about are people who pretend to be racially Jews and the good Jews are racial Jews. I can get what you mean (although I could go on to some reasons why I think its not optimal to put things that way, which I won't), the point I wanted to make is that some people would say your definition is wrong, and lots of people would consider themselves real Jews. This is what I meant with: not even Jews can agree with who or what is a real Jew.
>How the hell is this happening??
Unironically? Jews.
More specifically? Not all Jews (obviously), but Jewish interest groups and a lot of individual Jews that were bent on repeating the same strategy they have used as nomad people over the centuries, where they infiltrate institutions and governments and the media and use their power to push for multi-culturalism and more migration, in order to break down the host Country homogeneity as to be more powerful as a minority (the more you can dig at the power and influence of the majority, the more power minorities get, which means that if you're a minority you get more power).
The same thing is happening in the UK (pic 1).
Pics related.
Most likely, a nomadic people with no nation would find itself self-selecting those traits for Darwinistic purposes, but that does not mean that racial Jews should be thrown into the oven.
What needs be done in regards to the Jewish related issues in the West is to terminate Jewish collective power in its entirety (and off course, there are other non-Jewish related issues that need fixing, the Jewish related issues are not the only issues that exist), and its possible to do so in just, peaceful and fair ways.
>Problem is their men essentially adapted to feminie traits over time as part of their evolution
I can see what you mean. Their group behavior is akin to women's (or children's, or dog's) behavior, as a group they are in a perpetual state of shit testing their host Countries, and will take everything they can from you if you don't put them in their place.
>Segregation may be the only option.
I think that's unlike, I think if Western Countries terminate all Jewish collective power and enforce freedom of speech (as in, no retarded "anti-Semitism" laws and such bullshit, which does no favors to the Jews because it only increases tensions against them), they will be able to get integrated despite whatever racial traits they carry in their genes.
PS: note that I am not saying that demographics is not destiny, because it is, this is why I think that Whites should make up at least 80% of the demographics of any Western Country (and I think its possible to achieve it with peaceful and fair solutions that don't alienate non-White Patriots).
*unlikely
>Man can not prevent dying and suffering.
Next time you get a cut, make sure to not use any kind of man made disinfectant, then when the wound gets infected, make sure you do nothing about it.
Kek, are you insane, he would have been dead from the get go.
They are betting on that faggola Pete "Butt-gig" Buttigieg.
https://www.neonrevolt.com/2019/03/31/they-want-the-keys-to-the-kingdom-unmasking-obamainwhiteface-petebuttigieg-with-the-help-of-sorosrentboy-franklinleonard-qanon-greatawakening-blacklistanon-neonrevolt/
I don't know exactly what it is you're trying to say here, but I assume it has to do with the right to freedom of association.
I never said that people in the West should not have it, because I think they should, what I am saying thou is, people in the West can fix their demographics and have access to a right of freedom of association without having to be violent or "mean" towards other groups (and some minorities can even desire to associate with only those of their own kind, Cassius Clay was pretty much in favor of Black people living along and marrying with Black people exclusively, for example). I don't have to say that all X are Y to make a case for the right of freedom of association (and if someone gets their feelings hurt about it, then its not my fault).
I think you misunderstood what I was saying.
That article of his is badass.
That interview about Gladio and Gladio 2 and the Israeli/Turkish spying and intel selling is amazeballs.
You're a moron.
Have a video.
And a post of Q literally saying that this place is not only about research, its about freedom of speech for ideas that are outside of the mainstream.
Why did Q quoted an article of his then?