>>6032149 lb lb lb
oh there is massive sauce anon
i have been a biblical "scholar" (amatuer) for decades and read volumes of the anchor bible commentaries and many jewish scholars too
check out maurio biglio
then read the sumerian tablets
then dig on how they tablets relate to bible sections
and explains a lot such as ezekiels chariot and many others
my advice is do not share this with institutional counselors or medical staff
they are part of a system that does NOT permit this
they CANNOT support you or they will get fired or sued or stripped of licenses
stick to topics they can help with like housing meals relationships jobs and emotional control
do NOT mention what the SYSTEM declares a conspiracy
plenty of time later when/if all is exposed
i understand
it funny but in a very real way you must treat THEM as the patient
ie be careful and accurate and plan what you say
good news = you are no doubt far more intelligent and caring than them which does lead to emotioal problems
carry on fren
its worth the effort
answers many questions that anons enquiring minds want to know…..
ps - also checkout herbert spencers essay "on the knowable"
it helps a lot to know where the limit to full comprehension/understanding lays
for logic and philosophyfags
herbert spencer
The "Unknowable"
Spencer argued that either from the point of view of religion or science, whether we are concerned proposing a Creator or a substratum that underlies our experience of phenomena, we can frame no conception of it. Therefore, religion and science agree in the supreme truth that the ultimate reality ('the absolute') cannot be grasped by human understanding, which is only capable of "relative" knowledge. For this reason H. P. Blavatsky wrote that Spencer "like Schopenhauer and von Hartmann, only reflects an aspect of the old esoteric philosophers, and hence lands his readers on the bleak shore of Agnostic despair…"[1] He called this principle "the Unknowable", and thought that the It represented the ultimate stage in the evolution of religion, the final elimination of its last anthropomorphic vestiges
>Agnostic despair
i posted this but that part i do not agree
the cabal had to destroy spencer and they did
what i got out of spencer was the realization that humans cannot comprehend the nature of infinity
from there all falls into place
well that middle sentence is unnecesarily dark IMO but basically accurate
cuz it does not have to be evil
we do choose
but we are all subject to the laws of creation and have no power before them