>>6032156
>What logical information do you have to back your theory? Any sources that could help explain this theory… or just a wild idea?
Hulda Clark - "The cure for all cancers". Read that book anon.
sorry, should have been (pb)
>unknowable
that does not question the eternally creative intelligence does not exist, merely places restrictions regarding its complete knowledge. SO agnostic despair is a shill derail by earlier interpreters.
correct. therefore one surrenders to the absolute FACT that one CANNOT explain the totality of his/her existence merely on his thoughts. Therefore he/she is under the complete mercy of the superior driver of intelligence. Logic can only bring you up until before this realization.