>>6038939 Daily Beast says Q turned on Gorka (but unclear so far whether it's really true)
can anyone explain this further? I'm a bit confused.
we tell you to lurk moar for these reasons.
the whole point of posting those things is so normies like you don't come here.
the same process has unfolded time and time again on this thing we call the internet.
first it's basic like porn. when confronted, they claim free speech. then they ease us further and further and throw up gore, distract with flat earth and aliens and shit, and then ultimately if the platform is too effective, they post child pornography to get us shut down.
if you lurked moar, that would all be obvious to you.
now stop being so weak and focus. lives are quite literally at stake here.
stop being so incompetent.
tell them why what they're doing is effective and explain the methodology.
if they don't know the shills want to control us sexually to distract us, embed vulgarity and pornography here so normies stay away, and keep us talking about shit like this so we don't do actually helpful things, they'll all just be stupid and won't learn how to be more useful.
If we explain things like this every time it will be tedious, that won't be argued by me. But, it can also be effective in extinguishing the shill tactic.
just a thought i guess
call me a shill if you want, fag.
i've never cared about gorka and i don't know what his role is.
i also don't use twitter
what in fuck grants you the audacity to demand that i be nice to you?