Yep I remember checking that out about 10 yrs ago
Its true
Its with all the legally correct but not recognised by any govt authority/policeman/court civil rights - when we are born we are 'bonded' as our name is ALL IN CAPS which means we're a 'Corporate Entity' not a free person…
Some people tried to fight in court with some success in the UK - fun stuff
Look up 'Freeman on the land' or 'Maritime Law'
"The 'Commonwealth of Australia' with the ABN 122 104 616 is registered (consisting of the above mentioned 'states' or businesses) with the United States of America, Securities and Exchange Commission, No. 00 080 5157, as a result open for trading on the global market place.
Each individual is given a CUSIP number which then translates to a bond value which is put on the stock exchange"
>>6043185th
'Sovereign Citizens'
it won't be in breads coz Q's never mentioned it but
https://xcomputerdavex.blogspot.com/2012/09/law-of-land-or-law-of-sea.html
https://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/2006960
http://youveenteredlawland.com/freeman-on-the-land-australia/
"
Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia
There is much trickery in the word usage itself.
A "Sovereign Nation" for instance really means a "nation-state" or "a corporate entity with sovereign powers" such as the two entities COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA [SEC filing in Washington DC in 1934 already].
From what I can gather it appears that the original system of the Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia [lasted only for a relatively short time period between 1900-1919, perhaps in original form] is still in existence to this very day, but laying largely dormant due to the now non-existence of Constitutionally-approved money of substance as per the terms and conditions of original Constitution which in any case, was nothing more than a debt-repayment contract for debts of the country accrued between 1850-1900].
Then came the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CORPORATION at least as early as 1929 if not before, which has a SEC filing in Washington D.C. filed as early as 1934, a few years after the 1929 bankruptcy.
With it's PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH all of these, other than the original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia, are what you call SOVEREIGN NATIONS which really means "Corporate or Nation-States with Sovereign Power i.e. operating in their own right as properly established corporations with the power to make rules for their corporation and those who are members of their corporations i.e. AUSTRALIAN CITIZENS.
It appears that Queen Elizabeth the Second [the true original Monarch] cannot not assent to legislation for the corporations known as COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA but her original Constitutional system is still in existence albeit laying dorment due to the fact that we are not operating according to the law in our financial affairs [i.e. we are NOT using Constitutional money of substance, the most critically important but least known or mentioned "condition" of the original Constitution].
Put in another way, the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, under the Constitution is now a foreign entity to the corporations/nation-state/SOVEREIGN NATIONS known as COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA which belong to and essentially established by the IMF/UNITED NATIONS.
Therefore in our current PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH one cannot swear allegiance to a foreign entity - that is, the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, under the Constitution hereby established that is now an entity foreign to that corporation known as COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA, with a fictional "QUEEN OF AUSTRALIA" which is just a fictional title [no flesh and blood entity behind it].
So in reality the Constitutional protections and true protection of the law lay in one claiming to be a member of the original Constitutional Commonwealth…"