WTF is this DOUG / Neon crap Anon sees in the NOTABLES?

Neon is a TRAITOR and PAYtriot.

We've been over this many, many times.

Neons first back- stabbing came during the 666 Fifth Ave breads where they attempted to direct and force research to a desired end in an effort to obtain a salacious story and then run the results thru their site and monetize it.

Anons ok with being used in this manner?

Allowing Q to be used, mis-directed and quoted of supporting bad research and lies from nothing? That is what happened.

Those incidents occurred almost 2 years ago and for most of the time since, Bakers have kept neon from our Notables. But now we have neon again in our notes and dialog and AGAIN neon is using this spotlight to boost his name and site and allow him moar views / viewership and moar money to be made off of our research and efforts.

Anons ok with that?

Neon is NOT our fren. Not in any way, shape or form. Neon is just as bad as Doug and MAGA coalition. Perhaps neon is part of the coalition?

PLEASE IGNORE AND LEAVE NEON OUT OF 8 CHAN

Neon has no allegiance to us nor is he interested in our success- only neon success.

BE CAREFUL WHO YOU FOLLOW

Neon will take this site down if Anons allow it to continue

[and this Anon will continue to post about eliminating neon here. personally dedicated two+ years of my life and thousands of Notables to this project and have no intention of allowing neon or his ilk to blacken our collective eye]

>>6046341

>>6046318

Bill?

Famefag? Namefag? NOT Anonymous = NOT Anon = NOT one of us.

GTFO with this shit and with Bill.

>>6046513

>Kinda sounds like you're telling people what to think…And with a copypasta nonetheless…

You're a fuking moran. Anons can think all they want. RESEARCH and think for yourself, right?

Check the archives ass-clown. Neons history is all there.

Were you part of the process 2 years ago? Do you know what happened? If not, then YOU are the one insinuating that what is being pointed out here is misdirection and YOU are telling Anons what to think.

Your attempt FAILS.

Do the research and think for yourself. ←–

>>6046514

>Fuck you both.

Bwahaha! Truth hurts, don't it?

You glow faggot.

Namefagging has never been part of what 8Chan is. GTFO with this shit

>>6046635

>It's got nothing to do with NeonRevolt.

Not true! Neon is mentioned in the Notable itself!

This is nothing moar than an attempt to get moar eyes at neon's site and moar $ in neon's pocket.

Same story different day.

If it has nothing to do with neon, then why is neon named within the Notable title itself. THINK

>>6046635

Should have mentioned that neon has keys to the kitchen.

Makes moar sense now, eh?

If you had a competing news site and had access to your enemies news, would you plant idiotic stories to discredit them and bring moar eyes to your site as a result?

Neon having keys to the kitchen is a problem.

>>6046715

>Dude, Neon was only in notables because we called him out

And that's news?

It's belittling to us to stoop to such shit-slinging!

WE ARE THE NEWS

Is neon news?

Putting him in Notables makes him news. THINK

>>6046754

>We're talking about Doug Stewart struggling to hold onto his shill gig, not neon revolt.

WRONG Baker put neon in NOTABLES in association with this Doug bullshit.

NONE of this is news but Anons are making it news.

THAT is disgraceful!

THAT harms our reputation of being a serous news source.

We become a mud-slinging tabloid if we resort to finger-pointing irrelevant actors such as this Doug.

Chat it up- leave it out of Notables. NEWS belongs in Notavbles, not this crap.

>>6046780

>Neon said that Doug was exactly MuhJoo AND anti-semetic.

FFS! You're doing it too!

Neon has you talking about him instead of producing and supporting REAL NEWS!

This all brings moar eyes to neon which is exactly why neon has enetered this fray and why it continues- cuz it's bringing moar Anons to neons site and moar $ in neons pocket.

Pretty simple and y'all are perpetuating it by continuing to talk about it.

Stuff that tabloids are made of. None of it REAL NEWS

>>6046817

> I did trust many of them, but not anymore.

THOSE YOU TRUST THE MOST

Is ok Anon. It's all a learning process.

neon has much history here. Now you know!

WWG1WGA!

>>6046767

>Q has only been posting a year and a half

YOU are a fuking idiot.

Ever heard of our humble beginnings on CBTS?

MUCH research done there prior to Q's debut.

YOU are the one that has no clue about timelines.

Get it straight or STFU