This is the Q Century Project.

Send an E-mail to be put into contact with other Q supporters who want to think for themselves. More information will be available soon.

qcentury@protonmail.com

Create a new E-mail for this if desired. Stop using their centralized communications. We must distribute COMMS outside of all centralized platforms. Do not trust anyone. Q is larger than any one and we must ensure that communications will remain intact to coordinate future action. No more social media. No more Q websites. No more administrators. No more moderators. No more paytriots. The above E-mail will become irrelevant and disconnected.

https://mashable.com/2007/09/05/email-toolbox/

I trust the plan but I have a plan as well. Think for yourselves. It is time for action now.

Are you tired of waiting?

Do you want to bring the light?

Are you willing to fight for your rights?

Do you understand what is going to happen if we fail?

Send me an E-mail and I will explain by the end of the week. I can't do this without you.

This project does not involve or promote any type of illegal activity. This project is not a LARP. This project is about thinking and acting independently.

—–

To the shills in last bread. Yes, there was a map of Q supporters contact info. Yes, we used to disallow NSFW content. Yes, you are a newfag who still needs to think for yourself.

https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Rule+3%3A+NSFW+content+is+NOT+allowed.+Open+a+new+tab+ya%27+wankers.%22

Did you archive everything? No. You have no idea. Think for yourselves.

>>6048676

I didn't say Q posted a map. We did. The original supporters. It wasn't terribly popular but it happened.

>>6048686

No divison, only thinking. Need more thinking and less blind followers.

>>6048732

You're looking at maps, not a map that had our contact info. It was a separate page.

Feel free to look at my original post here where I linked where NSFW content wasn't allowed. No one believed that either but there is the proof.

>>6048709

There wasn't a rule 3 that NSFW content wasn't allowed?

Honestly my last few posts here have given me insight into what Q must feel like.

"They can't even practice basic reading comprehension when they jump to conclusions… sigh… We'll keep trying. I'll correct them again."

>>6048780

Much respect Q that you've been so patient.

>>6048769

So would I but I doubt I'd ever be able to find any. It was just a project same as I'm proposing that if anything happened we should be able to find each other.

That drives people wild for some reason now. Different group of people who think giving someone a throw away E-mail address is the end of the world and equivalent to posting your name, picture, and address.

>>6048806

You are thinking for yourself. Congrats.

>>6048866

Did I ever say I had evidence of that claim? No.

Like I said, now I know how Q feels when people think they're being clever.

Instead I made an alternate claim regarding NSFW which I could back up. No one wants to talk about that though do they?

Got called a shill, liar, etc about that as well, back it up with evidence, and everyone shuts the fuck up and clings to the other thing I mentioned.

Whatever. Many people have already E-mailed and it is not a setup.

>>6048904

Bitcoin up from $3,800 to $5,200. Down to $4,800 over a couple days. "Bitcoin dead."

>>6048963

No, I didn't. I only made the claim I would provide evidence about the NSFW rule. Then I called you a newfag who has no idea what you're talking about. Everything I said was true and I provided the proof as I said I would for that specific claim. Low reading comprehension. If I'm wrong, sorry, we all make mistakes.

https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Rule+3%3A+NSFW+content+is+NOT+allowed.+Open+a+new+tab+ya%27+wankers.%22

>>6048963

Also the quality of discussion was much higher back when NSFW content wasn't allowed but I've never complained about it.

>>6049102

Oh yeah, I'm definitely out of this drags into the 2020 election. This year, 2019, is the absolute deadline in my mind.

After that we're going to handle things ourselves. See Q Century Project.

>>6049267

Malik testifying, Roseann testifying, who else?

>>6049268

This baker is trying to be a CNN newscaster. Second time now I'm telling you to stop putting crap in there and ignoring other notables.

Notables isn't a giant list of news. Keep it concise and stop sliding past notables limiting to only 2 threads cause you made it so fucking long.