Anonymous ID: 6ae8e1 March 9, 2018, 3:58 p.m. No.605585   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5610

>>605255

Kind of lost as to who is referenced here, @Jack or @Snowden, in that this seems like a confirmation of the previous anons assertion this was related to twitter receivership…. but, i could also see how this could be read as @snowden having responded… @Jack had the newsweek article which was public and @Snowden met some prince or something and it was also sort of public…

 

how do you guys read it anons?