>>6049787 /lb

Publishing B.S. for you or How to lie like a sidewalk without saying anything but insulting all. Words inserted that, once realized, change what is being said to nothing.

"controversial" - only to the authors

"was more likely" - that's what we believe without knowing anything

"Some…have told associates…" - who and whom?

"failed to adequately portray" - they didn't include what I said. Where's my (you)?

"Never mind this wasn't 100% true" - how does the author know? Has he read the report?

"was it even close" - not as close as the truth, which is No Collusion, No Conspiracy, No Obstruction.

"…they appear to be…" to whom is their appearance relevant and noticeable?

"in as much as multiple members…told associates who told the nyt…" so, anonymous people from who knows where but we are to rely on the say-so of the nyt - told others who then told the nyt or in other words, the script was provided to some people who studied it and then gave it to the nyt which then printed/repeated what they were told to say but nobody knows who they are but we should believe what they are saying.

"which he then promptly ignored" we gave him our phony documents but he didn't accept them. Waaaah!

The next two paragraph are just so much BS that was written to support the foregone conclusion that AG Barr simply works for President Trump and so obviously can't be trusted it is sickening to think that the intellectual bar is so abysmal for wastes of electricity like the nyt.