On previous bread I went down the whole Neonrevolt/Dougie-no-longer-Anon rabbit hole here:
https://www.neonrevolt.com/2019/04/03/compulsive-liar-realdougstewart-caught-posting-anti-semitic-memes-and-a-photo-of-dismembered-child-to-8chan-trying-to-frame-anons-qanon-greatawakening-sloppyjobmossad-neonrevolt/
So, I get that Dougie is a shithead and been outed for plent of bullshit, but in the end, after all the Quads, wasn’t dougie’s point correct….basically shilly reasons he was engaging with friendly-reminder-bot to a)fuck up the bread and b) get screenshots….that said though the neonrevolt arguement that he dougie was conclusively playing both sides, it not supported, and I wrong? It seems pointless to make that argument when what could be concluded was enough to expose dougie for being a complete dumbass, engaging only one poster and likely bot at that to make the case for for all the supposed “muh joo Anons” or whatever the fuck case he was trying to make.
Sorry I’m phonefagging here, but the question is, is neonrevolt a shill making poor argument for dougie shill to save face with a softball argument?
Sorry don’t mean to slide, just asking bc I made the mistake of reading all that shit.