>>6055631 (LB)

Yet you have 44 replies in that bread, most to me. You can't even be

honest with yourself.

If I'm so wrong, it should be easy to prove. Rather than actually making an attempt,

you come up with this lame excuse. You've got nothing else and you're a coward.

You're afraid to look for the evidence because deep down, you know it doesn't

exist. Might it in the future? Sure, I never said it wouldn't, but I don't know, and

I'm not so crass as to ruin someone just because of feelz or whatever it is

that you are using to justify this terrible behavior.

>>6055622 (LB)

No, I'm just getting tired of the stupidity. If anons want to be believed,

they need to actually start applying the logic they claim to understand.

It's pretty pathetic when these non-stop accusations of high crimes

are just considered acceptable. The ENTIRE point of the Kavanaugh

hearings (which also weren't a trial Mr. Lawyer) was that we can't

just go around accusing people of things without evidence. You're

wrong, I'm not division fagging, everybody that keeps doing this

shit is, however.

>>6055668

It has to involve kidnapping or rape and result in serious bodily

harm or death. Look it up. This is easy, anon.

So, tell me, when did Comey take away a citizens rights by

kidnapping or raping someone, which then resulted in their death

or serious bodily harm, and what evidence

do you have that

supports that?

>>6055703

Ya'll are the ones that are crying. Not me. I'm torching your long

held beliefs and you don't know how to respond. It's amusing at

least a little.

If I'm so wrong, why is is so hard to prove it?

>>6055681

That was 4 years ago. I haven't heard more (and this wasn't widely

publicized, either) and I live hear. I wonder if it went anywhere?

>>6055754

Thanks for the advice, fren, but sometimes you just gotta set things

right in hopes that it will catch on. There's a reason Q posts here.

>>6055778

>"knowingly and intentionally, or with reckless

>disregard for the truth," makes a statement which is not "believed

>or appropriately accepted by the affiant as true."'

Do you see that word I mentioned? Affiant. Look it up. Comey wasn't

the affiant. Neither was Rosenstein.

This is your proof that supports my argument, btw. Just thought I'd

throw that out there.

>>6055786

At least one of 'em is trying. But you're right, I've probably let it go on

too long.

>>6055778

>Just hang up your hat.

Worth pointing out extra special style that I just made you hang

up your own hat with your own "proof." It's not that hard when

you are right.

>>6055812

I'll give you guys one more bite at the apple: treason is defined

in the Constitution, which is not what you are claiming. Just

because you want it to be, doesn't make it so. This is grade

school level civics, and the text is available anywhere.

Try harder.

>>6055834

The only one that matters is the one in the Constitution, anon,

and then codified in USC. It's pretty plain text.

>>6055836

Has his condition ever been explained? He's a character actor, so I

guess that means he goes all out to get into character, so maybe

that includes starving yourself to play a cancer patient… or he's

actually a cancer patient.

>>6055840

>And incidentally @CarpeDonktum is /ourguy/ too.

Awww… but he's such an ass. Gorka is, too, frankly, but he's an

actual pundit so you expect that.

>>6055881

I can't argue this. There's enough sense like this in here to keep me

coming back. And, like I said, Q posts here for a reason. Frankly, I

think it's too slow, too, but I started down this path back when you

literally had to use a dial-up phone to get into the bulletin boards

for information. I suppose I can wait another year or so (though I

don't think it will be that long).

>>6055922

Yeah, yeah, I don't think they even need to know who the other actors

are. In fact, I'm certain that's intentional. You're much more believable

doing your thing when you whine about the other actors.

>>6055825

I often wonder if that's really what they're waiting on. Normies coming

around and realizing what they've been doing this whole time.

>>6055975

What are you talking about? I'm referring to Donktum being an ass

towards Q. KYS for not understanding such simple context.

>>6056028

Timezone differences.

>>6056065

This is just one piece of it, IMO. There are many others on twatter, FB,

various other places. Q is being discussed everywhere. And it's not

just Q. You've got all these nonsensical things that are getting big

press: Avenatti, Stormy, Tom Arnold, Omarosa, Kashoggi, Kavanaugh,

Flynn's case, and coming soon, Cohen and Comey.

I think their approach is to convince different segments with different

methods. Some people are convinced by the conspiracy theory aspect

that Q satisfies. Some are convinced by the talking heads (Hannity,

Gorka). Then you have all the citizen journalists getting closer by

the day. Look at the work from some of these guys and compare

it to a year ago. They're all converging.

I think they just want people to believe it's true before they come

out and tell them it's true.

>>6056196

"Art."