Anonymous ID: 31271b April 5, 2019, 1:01 a.m. No.6056420   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6441 >>6450 >>6488

I never understood why Q uses the "if they attack us so much, that means we're legit" argument. I had also not actually read the hit pieces, and HOLY SHIT they're desperate. It's insane. You can hear the fear in their holier-than-thou voices.

 

Take this WaPo article:

 

>New poll: the QAnon conspiracy movement is very unpopular

 

Fuck polls anyway, but who the fuck POLLS people on such a "ridiculous" conspiracy?

 

>“Q” is supposedly a high-ranking official in the Energy Department with a high-level security clearance. “Q,” the theory goes, is working for Trump and against the supposed “deep state.”

 

The Energy Department… really…

 

>In fact, the only person in our comparison to do worse than the QAnon movement, although not by much, is Fidel Castro. (This is Florida, where people danced in the streets to celebrate the dictator’s demise.)

 

Media is scared and resorting to blatant mind games. I wonder how many buy it?

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2018/08/30/the-qanon-conspiracy-movement-is-very-unpopular-our-new-poll-finds/?utm_term=.d41b6ff0bf1a

Anonymous ID: 31271b April 5, 2019, 1:12 a.m. No.6056470   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6530

>>6056450

 

That's true, Q hasn't put it in those exact terms, but I was putting more weight on it due to the fact Q team has mentioned it SO many times. "can you name a group more attacked?" etc

 

Sidenote.. Where did those images come from? Link? Looks interesting.