>>6058449 pb
I skimmed it and I don't see the company
I don't think this video is it.
There were maybe 7 men there, a private consortium who had been studying her records for almost ten years.
Huber was expected to attend but did not
>>6058244 pb
No they were Doyle and Moynihan
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4768364/doyle-moynihan
>>6057881 pb
So they say. Can't trust the Media.
they claimed HRCs rallies were packed too.
Also, He sure doesn't get a Rock Star reception in the USA.
Doug is jealous since he's outed and his whole gang of associates are outed with him. and he's going down the drain
kek
"Ruining people's lives"?
Projection
"ATTN PRESS / MSM
When you see something that’s outrageous: before latching onto it you must first understand this is open to anyone. Posts are made to try and attribute the most outlandish and unrelated things to our work … intended to support the narrative that we are loons and discourage others from joining us. Use this tool to help spot this deception:
http://qresear.ch and type the exact text of a given subject and you will see it posted thousands of times. We aren’t idiots and don’t repeat a topic 24x7.
They don’t contribute to any active discussion, regardless of the gravity of the news. They also have much higher post counts, usually over 15. This is viewed as disrespectful to other anons, as there are limits on each thread to the number of replies.
Thus these ruses are easy to spot.
The most common are hateful towards a given group or what we call “slides” where it’s intended to distract from major news. These are entirely planted, and users are paid to do so. This board is not much different from any comment section on a site, and yes they get paid to “shape” opinion there too. The notion we can prevent something like this, when anyone can post anonymously, is a huge leap. We are busy with current events and research and filter them or ignore it. This isn’t one of your safe spaces, so if you can’t discern the difference, you shouldn’t be here.
Thanks For Playing, Come Again
TOGETHER WE ARE STRONG
DIVIDED WE ARE WEAK
WWG1WGA
For The Consideration Of The Press and Independent Journalists
Literally anyone can post literally anything here, and many do.
There are a few free-speaking anons here, along with a number of orchestrated shilling campaigns on behalf of a corrupt establishment. In the same way that Fusion GPS created the "Russia Dossier," organizations like ShareBlue, "MAGA Coalition," and others get paid to shape opinions and try to steer the narrative here. It is up to you as a journalist to discern whether a post accurately represents the free speech and fresh ideas of Q Research General or if it is a "shill narrative," posted to falsely associate QR and anons with entities or events.
It is important to understand that a free speech board cannot prevent false narratives from being posted anonymously, and it can be a huge leap in comprehending this place to know that.
The NOTABLES section can sometimes help cut through the chaos and noise. Notables aren’t endorsements. You must discern for yourself.
After being here for a while you might begin to see how you are being shilled in other communities, online or otherwise.
Lately we have seen MSM try to portray us as violent and full of hatred. There has even been evidence of “journalists” making fake posts themselves for a story. however, many anons consider that if a post is hate based, it is paid / fake.
NOTHING Q has said supports a hate-based narrative.