Anonymous ID: 8644f3 April 5, 2019, 9:42 a.m. No.6059621   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9710

>>6059200

Last night an ignorant newbie argue the case for Comey [dindu nuttn]

when it finally wound down after it's ass was beat, the one question remained:

Under USA Constitution "treason" is "given succor to enemies" or ~"colluding with enemies"

searchable Constitution

https://www.rocketlawyer.com/article/us-constitution-full-text.rl

"Treason" re Congress:

"They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses"

 

"The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."

^^^^^

Why they needed for POTUS to be accused of colluding with a foreign power. They planned to remove him for "Treason"

 

Tables are turned now.

 

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

 

"Adhering to Enemies

Giving them Aid and Comfort."

 

So will it be easier to convict those who traveled to London - who colluded with Deep States forces of the English, of Treason.

What are the names of the Justice Dept. administrators who traveled there?

Page and Strzok are two

Who else?

 

"The Congress shall have power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted."

 

^^ in the old days of Life in England with Kings and Queens , if a person was charged as an Enemy of the Head of State [Monarch] they would have all their property forfeited and seized. So, their entire estate would be wiped out. And the title, which would ordinarily fall into the next generation, would be ended.

 

This was presumably misused by insane royalty to confiscate property, lands, estates, titles. So our Constitution is limiting the act of Confiscation, as a result of the charge of Treason, to the person so charged and not the progeny?

 

"A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime"

 

Interesting that the Congress names the penalty for the finding of Treason?

If certain Congresspeople were found guilty I'd assume that means they don't get to vote on their own penalty [As they now get to vote on their salaries?]

 

So is the point of being named by the Executive "domestic terrorist" so the person can be tried by a tribunal, And named a Domestic Enemy of the State; and thereby be found guilty of Treason?

 

thats why Dianne F. was interested in the question of "Domestic Terrorists" and if they could be tried by Tribunal/

 

If they confess in open Court they can be found guilt of Treason

 

Would the 16 year plan be enough to name you as a "Domestic Terrorist?" Or would you have to collude with foreign powers also?

Plans to;

"Overthrow of the Constitution / Bill of Rights" wouldn't that be giving comfort to those who hate us for our freedoms? = Treason

 

We can assume Sessions was working out all these issues / problems during the "down time" when everyone screamed he was doing "nothing?"

Anonymous ID: 8644f3 April 5, 2019, 9:49 a.m. No.6059710   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6059621

I guess the 16 year plan, on its face, would be levying war against the United States?

On its face.

Just thought of that re-reading my own post.

Anonymous ID: 8644f3 April 5, 2019, 9:57 a.m. No.6059792   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9802 >>9963

>>6059772

Everytime I see Doug back here I want to put the message up with the name "Doug" in it.

Why would any honest anon care?

"Muh spam?"

Well you skip over all the other spam; why is this different and singled out for official board push-back?

Anonymous ID: 8644f3 April 5, 2019, 10:12 a.m. No.6059963   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0322

>>6059792

>>6059802

This notice is posted much less often than the Jew-hater spiels.

why does it touch a nerve?

Noone has explained why I shouldn't post it.

BO BV CM Baker.

It's a disclaimer for the newbies. Tip them off about the shills?

Anonymous ID: 8644f3 April 5, 2019, 10:14 a.m. No.6060002   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0020

>>6059912

That's a good tweet by POTUS.

It never a good idea not to pay your lawyer.

I suppose HRC's lawyer worked pro bono

Unless you have experience, most simpletons would never guess their own lawyer would sell them out?

I heard of it, That's how I know.

I feel sorry for Cohen.

Anonymous ID: 8644f3 April 5, 2019, 10:35 a.m. No.6060287   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0304 >>0319 >>0323 >>0324

>>6059972

I'm allowed my own judgment

If I want to post it I will.

I am not here to join a cult

Been there, Done that.

also, Yeah, the push back against it makes me want to post it even more.

Since it was never explained why it was offensive.

Also BV misrepresents my position.

I never claimed to speak for all anons.

Why would anyone assume that? Also, That's likely the reason it was never put in global since it did not speak for all?

I write for myself and think it's an important message.

The "Group Mind" of the Board also dumped on the anon who made the many many beautiful and important Biden memes, "Just Because"

They also ignored the guy who died while trying to get attention for his beautiful art - work "memes" "NewsWeak"

Now I' m glad I collected them all and am grateful for the Anons work,

"Group Mind" was incorrect about "Alex Jones;' at first, until it was aired.

Group Mind here "alleged consensus" might be wrong about a lot of things.

(You don't have "consensus" if you have one dissenting voice; in case you never studied the subject.)

I won't be bullied or black balled or blackmailed into consensus; that's why I've made it this far.

Sometimes the one person speaking out is what makes a difference.

I still don't hear a reason why it shouldn't be posted..

Oh I get it. The Board Admin voted it down for Global. and now they are butt hurt if anyone tries to "get around" their ban?

Makes perfect sense.

This is why I never bake. Too much experience with what happens when people get power over others. Since i "think different" I 'd be a constant target for the "consensus" group think.

It's quite "Communistic impluse" if you think about it.

consuses is so powerfull; I won't put it down. But I won't join if it' only to avoid attack or ostracism.

I still don't get why the posting of the message is a problem.

Even if it was every bread, so what?

Can someone explain it to me without using emotion and slur words?

Anonymous ID: 8644f3 April 5, 2019, 10:37 a.m. No.6060323   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6060287

CONSENSUS is so powerful;

It's a very important tool in politics.

I won't put it down.

But I won't join THE CONSENSUS if it's only IN ORDER to avoid attack or ostracism.