Yup.
Apologizing also puts an implied admission of guilt on the record, which
would force him to defend what he did later. Can't back out of that.
That one always read (to me) as if CDAN interchanged a few of the
names inadvertently. To my knowledge, Assange is not known to have
ever been close to Soros. Particularly since Assange and Anderson
are best buddies.
>How would you know if he was or wasn't?
He's important enough that you might, just pointing out that it isn't
something that has ever been publicized.
His relationship with Pamela Anderson IS well known, however. If
you read the article carefully, even the context seems to indicate
he meant to say "N and A are best buddies." Just my take, and it
was the first time I read it last summer.
I don't disagree with your assessment about CDAN, btw. He's a
bit of an oddity. You'd think by now he'd have been called out by
the elites since he seems to still show up to events and people
still give him information. At some point you'd think they'd stop
talking to 300 lb. lawyers about all their criminal activity.
> then didn't follow through.
Of course, they're socialists, so "following through" means pain
and misery for all of us.
He means the second image cut off his left breast view.