TY Baker!!!
They are going to keep growing, it seems. Like a weed in a bed of roses.
And depending on your POV, that dissemination of info could be considered espionage. Especially if Assange has had some unsavory friends over the years. Truth is, the only people in the know are the people in the know.
Man, I hope he's not there. That would just make people's heads explode, and send a message to the DS that "We can take you anytime we want."
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 3d632d No.594830 📁
Mar 8 2018 20:31:36 (EST)
@Snowden
24 Twitter.
A/B or C.
We can take you anytime.
Q
Take with a grain of salt. Could be a bad decode of Q, or could just be CDAN is wrong:
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 267e20 No.1918277 📁
Jun 26 2018 22:10:09 (EST)
Desperate agencies do stupid things.
Dead cat bounce.
You may have the site but we have the source.
https://mobile.twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1011441579565953025📁
Panic is good.
Panic is right.
July 2018 - the month the world discovered the TRUTH.
Conspiracy no more.
Time to FEED.
Q
https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2018/07/blind-items-revealed-38.html
>Wednesday, July 04, 2018
Reminder:
NK Has been "freed" since March of last year. That was 3 months after something caused a mountain to collapse with all the nuke engineers and nuclear supplies inside.
Anonymous ID: pGukiFmX No.147590619 📁
Nov 2 2017 01:47:47 (EST)
What a coincidence the mountain that housed NK’s nuclear weapons and testing collapsed. Unbelievable timing. I wonder if critically important materials as well as scientists aka the bomb makers were inside when it happened. Shocking no global news agency suspects we had nothing to do with it. Enjoy the crumbs.
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 27d57d No.594016 📁
Mar 8 2018 19:55:52 (EST)
Anonymous ID: 576924 No.593959 📁
Mar 8 2018 19:53:28 (EST)
nov14.png
⬇
>>593825
>>593959
Thank you Kim.
Deal made.
Clowns out.
Strings cut.
We took control.
Iran next.
Q
>Would this psyop be something that Trump would do to his base?
False premise, meet false conclusion. It's an operation, but it's more a continuous head fake to DS, while allowing anons to find the truth for themselves.
>To my knowledge, Assange is not known to have ever been close to Soros
How would you know if he was or wasn't?
Think of it this way. Did you know that Epstein had world elites bring children to be sexually abused and sacrificed to Satan, Lucifer, Belial, and Leviathan (princes representing the four cardinal directions), before Q? What about HRC and her allies' crimes against children?
Again, take CDAN with a grain of salt, but it makes a great deal of sense to me to think of it that way. WL had all the info. Soros had a need for all the info. Information is power, just like money is power. If Soros had access to all the info WL did, well, that'd make Soros able to do all sorts of fuckery all over the place, wouldn't it?
You know how I know you are barely old enough to drink?
A-10 Thunderbolt II
A-10 - 32156159151.jpg
An A-10 from the 74th Fighter Squadron after taking on fuel over Afghanistan
Role Fixed-wing close air support, forward air control, and ground-attack aircraft
National origin United States
Manufacturer Fairchild Republic
First flight 10 May 1972
Introduction October 1977[1]
Status In service
Primary user United States Air Force
Produced 1972–1984[2]
Number built 716[3]
Unit cost
US$18.8 million[4] (equivalent to $45.3 million today)
That is literally NOT what happened. Sarah Sanders answered a question about Q supporters and extremist groups using violence against reporters lumped into the same category, and she didn't single out or acknowledge the Q question at all in her response. She repeated her answer, actually, when trying to break it down in 2 parts.
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/sarah-huckabee-sanders-on-qanon-conspiracy-theory/
Pay attention. She completely dodged the Q question. Read the fucking banner. Why do you think it's there?
We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.
>So, Sarah Sanders didn't know what she was being asked?
I didn't say that, you did.
>Despite Q hyping the "ultimate question" for 2 weeks prior to it being asked?
What does that have to do with anything? Are you forgetting that Q said POTUS has to answer it? That's convenient.
>That's your story?
>Very convenient … and absolutely cucked to the bullshit that is Q.
I have no story. I presented factual information. You are arguing a point like some sort of Johnnie Cochran.
If you have some facts, present them. If you are here to argue based on conjecture, then just say "I just want to argue and not present any facts". It'll get the conversation over much sooner than 22 posts.