>6061651 (p/b)
Did anons notice in the included attorney letter that Geragos will be demanding of records and depositions, to be MADE PUBLIC?
>WE WILL SEEK TO HAVE ALL RECORDS AND HEARINGS ON THIS MATTER BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC
(emphasis added)
Are they this stupid or has Geragos been forced to be a "good actor" (i.e. the kind in a good movie) in light of his recent co-conspirator status?
Public Discovery >>Subpeona of unredacted phone records >>> bottom to top?
Q #2849:
>What happens if the phone records of SMOLLETT leak?
>Who did he talk to multiple times prior to turning himself in?
>Political forces @ work?