>>6065803

So, even though Paul states that he never taught where someone else had preached Christ:

Rom 15:20

Yea, so have I strived to preach the gospel, not where Christ was named, lest I should build upon another man's foundation:

And even though we know for a fact that Paul and Barnabas were the "apostles" to the Ephesians:

Ephesians 1:1

Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, to the saints which are at Ephesus, and to the faithful in Christ Jesus:

And even though Christ commended the church at Ephesus for figuring out they were being led by false apostles and liars:

Revelation 2:1

Unto the angel of the church of Ephesus write; These things saith he that holdeth the seven stars in his right hand, who walketh in the midst of the seven golden candlesticks;

Revelation 2:2

I know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are evil: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found them liars:

You continue to assume that Christ did NOT know that Paul and Barnabas were the "apostles" to the church at Ephesus?

>>6065881

>>6065916

>>6065803

You claim that Paul taught the Law. He did anything but teach the Law. Three times it is mentioned in the book of Acts, when Paul met with the real apostles John, James, and Peter.

And three times Paul agreed with what John, James, and Peter told him: That the gentiles should abstain from meat sacrificed to idols, things strangled, drinking blood, and fornication. Read it for yourself.

Acts 15:20

But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood.

Acts 15:29

That ye abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication: from which if ye keep yourselves, ye shall do well. Fare ye well.

Acts 21:25

As touching the Gentiles which believe, we have written and concluded that they observe no such thing, save only that they keep themselves from things offered to idols, and from blood, and from strangled, and from fornication.

Is this what Paul taught? No, it is not. He went on to teach that you could eat meats sacrificed to idols, if you prayed over it. When he wrote to the church of Galatians, he mentions his meeting with James, Peter, and John in Jerusalem.

He doesn't teach them to abstain from meats sacrificed to idols, things strangled, drinking blood, and fornication. He doesn't even mention it. Instead, PAUL LIES and tells the Galatians that the ONLY THING that the apostles requested, was that they remember to care for the poor, which was NEVER MENTIONED.

Galatians 2:10

Only they would that we should remember the poor; the same which I also was forward to do.

RECONCILE that BULLSHIT.

>>6066108

Was probably an accident. I keep getting bumped offline and losing where I was and who I was talking to…might have confused you with someone else. Not intentional.

>>6066029

Paul said that the Law was nailed to the cross with Christ. Christ said he came NOT to change the Law a jot or tittle.

Paul said that circumcision made Christ's sacrifice null. Then he turned around an circumcised Timothy.

Paul agreed to teach what John, Peter, and James said, regarding the gentiles abstaining from things strangled, drinking blood, fornication, and eating meats sacrificed to idols.

He lied to the Galatians and said the ONLY THING that the apostles requested, was to take care of the poor.

Further, Paul repeatedly states that he is convinced that no thing is unclean of itself, and that eating meats sacrificed to idols was allowed if you pray over it.

You can continue to defend Paul all you like. Christ clearly stated in REV 2:2 that the church at Ephesus had figured out that the "apostles" that were teaching them were false and liars.

Further, Christ specifically refuted Paul's teaching concerning the eating of meats sacrificed to idols, when addressing the church at Thyatira:

Rev 2:20

Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols.

Paul clearly states that he (along with Barnabas) were the apostles to the church at Ephesus. Are you claiming that Christ does not know that Paul and Barnabas are the "apostles" in question?

Paul meets NONE of the requirements established by the real apostles, for being an actual apostle.

This is proven when they vote to replace Judas, where they establish that the criteria that must be met includes four factors:

That a candidate for apostleship must have been with them from the beginning, that they saw Christ perform miracles, that they saw him crucified, and that they saw him resurrected.

Which one of these criteria does Paul meet? NONE. Unless of course, we believe his road to Damascus story, in which, Paul initially claimed he saw a bright light.

Later, when his authenticity was questioned, he changed the story to say that he saw Christ resurrected on the road to Damascus.

Further, why in the hell would Christ send Paul to Ananias, the UNCLE of CAIAPHUS, the fake jew high priest who was behind the killing of Christ?