>>6068022 (lb)

>but why would Q want Anons to make Q proofs?

Question to lawfags.

Every "conspiracy theory" ever made has been documented, with sauce, and listed in notables. If this board can be proven to be legit via Q-proofs could it be argued in a court of law that notables are credible evidence?

If so, that would mean that this board is the single place for all the open sourced info ever. Once credibility has been established there's no argument against the data. When corroborated with declassed info (they) are fucked.