Anonymous ID: 1fa63a April 5, 2019, 11:35 p.m. No.6069593   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9596

Interesting that Julian Assange has been in the news lately, and also that Donna Brazile started working as a commentator on Fox News. Weiner is now out of jail and has to register as a sex offender. Huma Abedin is currently MIA, but probably still very important.

 

Everybody and their mother is writing a book about Trump and everything related. Michelle Obama's book will be the greatest all-time top-seller in the history of books they say….probably all these books are completely irrelevant.

 

During the Democratic primaries before the 2016 election, there were several computer-related leaks about Clinton's computer server and DNC servers and other servers. The data breaches came from multiple sources–Wikileaks, Russian Hackers[?], even from Clinton insiders. Who was Seth Rich anyways?

 

Q posted early on about Donna Brazil making a deal, and not being prosecuted.

 

The following article, from a book written by Donna Brazile, is about the first Wikileaks drop that included DNC emails. The article is a very public admission from Donna about how the DNC was completely owned and controlled by HRC, and how the nomination was rigged for Hillary. Brazile took a lot of heat for this. Was this her deal? Several separate articles like this one came out on Nov 2, 2017–the same day Q made the post above.

 

Was this the deal she made? To go public on the fact that Clinton actually ran the DNC prior to being nominated, that there was no way anyone else could ever have been nominated by the Democrats? For doing so, would Donna get off Scot Free for rigging debates?

 

The DNC-HRC Wikileaks drops were an intervention [with info obtained by someone, how?] to ensure that Hillary wouldn't have a victory in 2016. The rigging for HRC was tight, and it took several tries.

 

Brazile was implicated herself in Wikileaks drops–sharing town hall debate questions with Clinton beforehand.

 

A WikiLeaks e-mail dump revealed that Brazile sent an e-mail message on March 5, 2016, to John Podesta and Jennifer Palmieri with the title: "One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash." The message continued, "her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint."[27] At the next event in Flint, Clinton was delivered a similar question from audience member Mikki Wade, whose family was affected by the poisoned water.[28]

 

On October 11, 2016, a WikiLeaks e-mail dump included an e-mail Brazile sent on March 12 to Clinton communications director Jennifer Palmieri with the subject header: "From time to time I get questions in advance."[29] In the e-mail, Brazile discussed her concern about Clinton's ability to field a question regarding the death penalty, and in a CNN town hall debate the following day, Clinton received a similar question about the death penalty.

 

This was a PERSONAL TESTIMONY from an insider. No Data needed to be leaked. This was someone who was on the inside and knew first hand how the system was being manipulated. Someone with intimate knowledge, an eye witness. And someone who says she loved Seth Rich.

 

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774

Anonymous ID: 1fa63a April 5, 2019, 11:35 p.m. No.6069596   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6069593 continued

 

But there were multiple separate sources of electronic data that suddenly appeared or disappeared, from different individuals, different mechanisms. This article relates to Huma Abedin & Hubby Carlos Danger. Coincidentally, involving the data from the Clinton server on his laptop in a folder named "insurance".

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/14/anthony-weiner-huma-abedin-sentencing-memo-242707

 

On Oct. 28, 2016, Comey upended the presidential campaign by informing Congress that the FBI would quickly review the Weiner laptop (but didn't, not really).

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/newly-released-emails-show-fbi-scrambling-to-respond-to-clinton-lawyer-amid-weiner-laptop-review

 

And text messages between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, miraculously found. They were erased from their cell phones but magically recovered so they could be used as evidence and further support in proving the conspiracy to commit treason.

 

Deals were made to provide evidence, reduce sentencing, provide immunity, and witness protection. What else?

 

And there was even yet another laptop with DNC Data:

 

A key, if under-covered, aspect of the “Pakistani mystery man” story is that Imran Awan, the Pakistani-born IT aide of former DNC head Debbie Wasserman Schultz, took a laptop with username RepDWS after he was banned from the House computer network for “unauthorized access to data,” and then left it in a phone booth with a letter to prosecutors. Found on April 5, 2017.

 

It's unclear what is on the laptop, but Wasserman Schultz was the head of the DNC at the time, and apparently Awan had access to many in the US Congress.

 

https://dailycaller.com/2017/09/06/exclusive-did-imran-want-capitol-police-to-find-wasserman-schultzs-laptop/

 

https://dailycaller.com/2018/04/22/trump-pakistani-mystery-man-documents-debbie-wasserman-schultz/

 

So there are backups for the backups. Sources for the sources. Everything is backstopped. A lot we might never know about. How will we ever know about what really happened with the vote count?

 

There was a decision to influence an election so that Hillary wouldn't win. Actors were [are still being] forced to play along. This was done to avoid something as drastic as military coup to remove Hillary. That would have involved countless casualties, untold risks. Hillary's victory would have likely lead to a real Holocaust.