>>6071066 lb maurice strong
notable. check what i found regarding the oversight of mauricestrong.com down at the bottom. this foundation is spoopy and on topic.
http://www.manitou.org/foundation/initiatives#grants
colorado land grants. sites designated on dept interior / tribal land (foreign soil virtually)
>>6071138 lb
>>>>6071033 (You)
>>
>>Absolutely possible, no way of knowing if is being done without looking at the server side code 8chan uses, but it is possible (and easy).
>thanks for confirming feasibility.
>paranoia justified!
>are we anons or are we devo?
>Patriots yes, but also lab rats, like the normies in their walled gardens of anti-social media?
>Who is learning what from our patterns, anons?
https://www.iarpa.gov/index.php/research-programs/forest
crowdsourcing an oracle
easy. they fbi doj qould not comment if person x was under investigation. doj is commenting on trump. he is not under investigation (anymore). barry though… you'd have to ask
shit Khorasan… i had been trying to think of that word for a while. Obama once said he was a tough hombre and pointed to strike he just authorized on a shadowy (unsauced / fake and gay even?) org called khorasan group.
we know a special counsel was appointed to investigate the trump campaign. We were never told prior to or during that special counsel that he was the target of a counterintelligence operation. hillary ordeal was a joke a best put on by the fbi summer stock players but it was not nor was she the target of a counterintelligence investigation. if evidence amassed should warrant such an op on Barry we would not be told. we would be left to infer from public domain gleaning only.
shit we gringos had a little adventure down to chapultapec castle over that affair didnt we? I believe we redrew the map of border on the way home too.
i see the film was lauded by mccain. are you suggesting original events inspired weirmar era adolff? seems reasonable on first glance.
um… if intelligence agencies were weaponized against a civilian purely for the domestic political purposes then yeah there would be some agencies opening cases if for no other reason than postierity of record. but it would actually go past postierity with the agencies that are charged with such tasks. since it appears to us here in public now that the ___ administration did have such things ongoing during its tenure, and at least it appears in this 1 instance at least a presidential candidate sought to gain from such matters for electoral purposes, i would say what is safe to say we cant see is to what extabt that administration and that campaign are under scrutiny. not whether they are or not. its not a big leap. plenty of places have people doing meticulous documentation and analysis and have for some time. its just not the news agencies, and that is sounds, is where you misplaced trust
i understand your point of concern. boot as in das boot??
murder is such a strong term. bombings in dresden arguably murder. battlefield me over you is casualty of war / institutionally forced survival. many people died in the pacific as well on both sides, and dont forget plenty of nazis ended up in the soviet union as well. concernfag… kek
oh and you forgot to add nasa is nazis
dont you have a performance of the wall to be at roger?
bu muh moral relativism
comey's gnome!
i was gonna say whats buddha doing with coin? made no sense until the end. thats not buddha thats his cousin ananda. learn the old comms