What the fuck are you talking about? All of his work is available for free on his website. The only way you have to pay to hear from him is if he gives an interview to some alt-media outfit that puts its shit behind a paywall.
Steele is fucking based.
phibetaiota.net
YouTube interviews are not his central thing by a long shot. You'd have to be a dipshit millennial to think he's just an "e-celeb." If you go to listen to him speak expecting that he's going to give you all his CIA-insider secrets, you're setting yourself up for disappointment. He makes very clear that what he does is very similar to what anons who dig do, except he's an actual former spy who's probably a lot better at it than most of us.
Nobody nominated him, he was recommended, and I forgot who he said it was. Someone from another country that heard him talk about open-source everything engineering. I know he's named them, I just don't remember the name.
He's said he hasn't violated his secrecy oath and that most of the dirty stuff he knows about CIA he found out about after he left.
It may be worth noting that he's friends with Bill Binney and Ray McGovern.
The bottom line is that all of the axiomatic "conspiracy" stuff that most of us have been reading about for years is stuff he talks about and has talked about at length and he points people to sources, usually books and other written work by other people. The fact that we have people who will take Alex Jones seriously but cry "disinfo agent" at Robert Steele is a fucking joke. He talks about pretty much everything and knows more than just about any "YouTuber" you can name.
Honestly, anon, I've had this conversation countless times with countless anons and it's always the same weak shit coming from people who are obviously not very familiar with him or his work. They're usually people who seem to be trying to establish themselves as being "too smart to be fooled" by him, like they're living out some kind of conspiracy pissing contest.
The one criticism I will throw his way is something that I think is related to his training, and that is that he can be pushy with people. A lot of people that glow have a way of communicating that comes across like they're trying to tell you what to do that may feel overbearing to regular people, but it's not really a surprise that someone with CIA training would come across that way.
I just don't care enough to do it just to answer you, anon.
>There are no "ex" C_A
That's a meme and I think it's been misapplied to CIA officers when it's really more in reference to assets, I.e., if the CIA got you running numbers for them in the past, you'll have a hard time not complying if they want you to do stuff for them again in the future.
>RDS is a Jesuit shill
He has spoken out against the Jesuits multiple times.
>is trying to insert himself into and re-direct the Q movement
False. The one thing he has most consistently said about Q is "I don't have time for riddles," but he has indicated that he thinks Q is "real." He's mentioned that he listens to breakdowns/analysis of the drops from someone, but I don't remember who.
>being the first guest of Jordan Sather, who was later interviewed by AJ. RDS is Sather's handler, now Fuck OFF!
Weak-ass logic.
Not sure, wouldn't surprise me.
He's been interviewed by a Jewish YouTuber, so he's a shill? Are you proud of that assessment?
Interdasting…
I'm talking about people who say that. If you didn't say that or don't say that, I'm not talking about you.
I've been surprised to realize how many redpilled people there are locally that just aren't that open about it
Mortal Kombat: Spygate Edition