Anonymous ID: a62b7e April 6, 2019, 9:28 a.m. No.6072814   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2831 >>2834 >>2861 >>2866 >>2877 >>2882 >>2886 >>2937 >>2992 >>3042 >>3050 >>3100 >>3112 >>3160 >>3238 >>3242 >>3364 >>3442 >>3478 >>3503

Why the hell have I never heard of SerialBrain2 until last night watching a Roseanne Barr video?

 

His analysis makes me feel inadequate. It is pretty amazing. Without checking behind, some of the stuff he connects seems kind of out there, but I am intrigued enough to learn.

 

Curious what other anon's think.

Anonymous ID: a62b7e April 6, 2019, 9:31 a.m. No.6072859   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6072834

 

I am not saying SerialBrain2 is Q.

 

Q never said research can't take place outside. In fact, Q encourages it by posting links to research away from these boards.

Anonymous ID: a62b7e April 6, 2019, 9:49 a.m. No.6073050   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3056 >>3088 >>3161 >>3222 >>3229

>>6072992

>>6072814

 

Dear Shill,

 

How can asking a curious question be lying?

 

and no, not a newfag. Been following Q since day one and others before Q.

 

Based on the unwarranted bashing SerialBrain2 seems to provoke, I am starting to think that he is legit.

 

The only thing that does make me question SerialBrain2 at this point is what this anon pointed out:

 

>>6072882

Anonymous ID: a62b7e April 6, 2019, 10:01 a.m. No.6073161   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3199

>>6073088

>>6073050

 

Your oddly worded response did make me somehow see the flaw in my question of the possibility of my original assertion potentially being a lie.

 

It is likely that I had come across SerialBrain2 in passing days/months prior but never had the interest to look into it until now.

 

Either way, the way I came across or interested in SerialBrain2 is moot.

 

The underlying questions is to the validity of the research SerialBrain2 has provided.

Anonymous ID: a62b7e April 6, 2019, 10:04 a.m. No.6073185   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3195 >>3207 >>3219 >>3244 >>3364

>>6073160

 

From what I understand, SerialBrain2 is not a paytriot.

 

The youtube channel, And We Know, is taking the writings of SerialBrain2 and putting it into an easily digestible format.

 

So really, the only paytriot here may be the owner of the YT channel, not the source of the research, SerialBrain2.

 

Unless you can prove that SerialBrain2 is somehow being paid for these videos, I will claim the above to be true.

Anonymous ID: a62b7e April 6, 2019, 10:22 a.m. No.6073364   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3385 >>3391 >>3413 >>3445 >>3532

>>6072814

>>6073185

>>6073244

 

Maybe ignorance is bliss.

 

I have been here from the beginning. Provided numerous notables. Never paid attention to the names of Anonymous accounts, except for Q.

 

In fact, I normally have a tendency to look away from anons trying to get extra notoriety.

 

But my research has been slow as of late and I was looking elsewhere and came across what may have been right in front of my face all along in SerialBrain2.

 

I am not taking a stance on SerialBrain2 being a paytriot until I have more evidence. Are some things a little off? Like why this person is on Reddit and the wrong VOAT board? Yes.

 

Q does say trust yourself, but I just want to add more research arrows to my quiver when deciphering information. Thus, SerialBrain2 opened my eyes on how I can look at things a little differently. Whether or not he is a paytriot, by bring my attention to another research technique, he has provided a service that I can be grateful for should the fruits of labor prove to be on point.

Anonymous ID: a62b7e April 6, 2019, 10:29 a.m. No.6073413   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6073364

 

It should be noted that I am not asking for notoriety in my own post. I am simply laying out my background to hush out the newfag claims.

 

I am just drawing this out because I find it quite curious that my original post has garnered so much negativity.

 

Some can look at me as being a shill, which I am not. But it is awfully shilly and down right attacking the responses I have received.