Anonymous ID: 309428 March 9, 2018, 6:41 p.m. No.607530   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8051

I need to vomit some connections real quick. They're in line with this >>602329

 

Snowden tweet: I had notes on this but it's been covered.

 

Q: SIS is good

RT:MI6 Played Ball, Q: + a lot more >>158405

 

Snowden tweet: Missing [i]

 

Remember Q's post with a missing [i]

We know that the i stands for Iridium meaning Iridium Communications.

https:// www.iridium.com/

>McLean VA (Remember CIA is/was an actor for the british crown / intel)

>Iridium NEXT

>>154468

What rocket fired today?

[i]

Message sent.

https:// www.nasaspaceflight.com/2017/12/spacex-2017-campaign-iridium-4-launch/

The rocket was carrying 10 Iridium Next satellites.

Who developed Iridium NEXT?

http:// spaceflight101.com/spacecraft/iridium-next/

>Development of the iridium system was handled by Motorola

Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't Motorola behind the whole cell phone brain voices thing?

(If I had to guess, it sounds like they were in a hurry to launch a some brain/cell tech on a global scale)

 

Q: Which country does he really work for?

 

My Theory: He works for the british crown / british intel

Eric Schmidt failed to get the comm link up and running to the iridium next sats.

Enter Snowden to finish the job.

Q flips MI6

Snowden becomes a liability

Q offers to take him in.

 

I'm still fighting with two definitions of the missing [i]

  1. The missing i means the sats never made it on board (which blows my theory on the comm link)

  2. Q knew Snowden would tweet a missing [i], and if that's the case.... how?

Anonymous ID: 309428 March 9, 2018, 7:40 p.m. No.608140   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8160

>>608053

About 200MM in the last 4 days alone.

http:// openinsider.com/screener?s=FB&o=&pl=&ph=&ll=&lh=&fd=7&fdr=&td=0&tdr=&fdlyl=&fdlyh=&daysago=&xs=1&vl=&vh=&ocl=&och=&sic1=-1&sicl=100&sich=9999&grp=0&nfl=&nfh=&nil=&nih=&nol=&noh=&v2l=&v2h=&oc2l=&oc2h=&sortcol=0&cnt=100&page=1