Anonymous ID: 864273 April 6, 2019, 10:55 a.m. No.6073680   🗄️.is 🔗kun

We have an anon on past bread that didn't get a birthday wish. I personally want to wish this anon and any other anon with a birthday today a very happy birthday and let him/them know we appreciate them and all anons.

Anonymous ID: 864273 April 6, 2019, 11:34 a.m. No.6074110   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4232

>>6073693

Nothing happening - how about all the chemical explosions? Perhaps the chemtrailing will stop

 

How about the Raleigh, North Carolina military op? Nothing to see there?

 

It's happening, but mostly behind the scenes.

Anonymous ID: 864273 April 6, 2019, 11:54 a.m. No.6074355   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Who has the worst, pandering fake Southern accent? 1. AOC 2. Hillary Clinton (I've made a little video for you to be the judge)

 

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1114270427679838208

Anonymous ID: 864273 April 6, 2019, 11:59 a.m. No.6074427   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6074011

Federal Judge "Shocked" To Find Obama State Dept Lied To Protect Hillary From Email Server Lawsuits

The noose appears to be tightening further around the law-less behaviors of the Obama administration in their frantic efforts to protect former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton from lawsuits seeking information about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's private email server and her handling of the 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

As Fox News reports, the transparency group Judicial Watch initially sued the State Department in 2014, seeking information about the response to the Benghazi attack after the government didn't respond to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. Other parallel lawsuits by Judicial Watch are probing issues like Clinton's server, whose existence was revealed during the course of the litigation.

The State Department had immediately moved to dismiss Judicial Watch's first lawsuit, but U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth (who was appointed to the bench by President Ronald Reagan) denied the request to dismiss the lawsuit at the time, and on Friday, he said he was happy he did, charging that State Department officials had intentionally misled him because other key documents, including those on Clinton's email server, had not in fact been produced.

"It was clear to me that at the time that I ruled initially, that false statements were made to me by career State Department officials, and it became more clear through discovery that the information that I was provided was clearly false regarding the adequacy of the search and this – what we now know turned out to be the Secretary’s email system."

"I don’t know the details of what kind of IG inquiry there was into why these career officials at the State Department would have filed false affidavits with me. I don’t know the details of why the Justice Department lawyers did not know false affidavits were being filed with me, but I was very relieved that I did not accept them and that I allowed limited discovery into what had happened."

In a somewhat stunningly frank exchange with Justice Department lawyer Robert Prince, the judge pressed the issue, accusing Prince of using "doublespeak" and "playing the same word games [Clinton] played."

That "was not true," the judge said, referring to the State Department's assurances in a sworn declaration that it had searched all relevant documents.

"It was a lie."

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-10-18/federal-judge-shocked-find-obama-state-dept-lied-protect-hillary-email-server