>>6078174 (lb)
>>6078192 (lb)
>>6078206 (lb)
>>6078248 (lb)
I dont' "watch" any of these folks on a regular basis. PM, Bill, and a few others out there; they seem to have their hearts in the right places, and have stumbled onto the "Q" discussion at a very critical time; or at least became engaged strategically; see it how you want based on your own discernment.
Anons have every right to be leery of anyone. Anons have watched as Corsi, Beanz, AJ, Cernovich, Loomer, Milo, and many others that some of us followed for years were exposed. We know they have handlers. We know they work for groups that fit into the structure that Q painted quite clearly for us long ago:
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 58bc71 No.2601101 📁
Aug 14 2018 17:46:46 (EST)
Ex 1.1
(MOS)
/ \
(Alt + US Media) (US Politicians)
/ \
(…………………..)(…………………….)
Those who scream the loudest….
Find the connections.
1:1:1:1
Primary>>AffiliateA>>AffiliateB>>AffiliateC>>
Marching to the same beat?
Coincidence?
Logical thinking.
Q
However,
Anons also know that the enemy we're dealing with that is working against Q will use all the same tactics as the "spiritual" enemy uses against those that serve God to deliver his message. Twisting words, conjecture, removing context, deception, character assassination, and all the logical fallacies we've read about and experienced from all over the chans.
I don't know, nor really do I give 2 shits if PM, Matrixxx, Bill, or whoever else are on the "right" side of this or not.
That's because I know that I'm on the right side of Q.
I also don't give a flying fuck who's decided to take their already previously installed messages/platforms that were generating $, and decided to embrace the Q movement in their works. It happens. If they use their platforms to reach the already 1000s of followers, then so be it! The message getting out there is the point. Just you wait till the day Hannity asks POTUS the Q, and Fox is the one to air it. You think Fox isn't going to make a monstrous amount of bank the day that happens?
You're fuckin-a right they will. Whatcha gonna do then? Boycott Fox?
ETS does make a point, though; and this is in no way an endorsement (I don't know them nor follow them on twitter; but I might now). If you didn't resist the temptation to use Q to catapult your platform for $, be warned. If you were already using a platform to generate wealth, and you just so happened to turn attention to the Q movement in your "shows", then that's what many of us would call a good thing. Just be careful about how you structure your cash cow when in company of the Q discussion. It might just come back to bite you. Q literally warned everyone about that, and if you chose to ignore that warning for a quick mortgage amortization, then you fucked yourself hard.
Having said all that:
TV Evangelists gave people like my grandmother a chance to be "in the word" when she couldn't go to church. Benny Hinn, and just about every other preacher-man at TBN, despite being the outright FRAUDS they are, have given billions around the world a chance at hope in communion with The Lord, and a pathway to discover their OWN relationship with God. And that's really what it all was about in the end.
If someone wants to trade $$ for spiritual advice, and there's a person that wants to pay the fee, then I say "Buyer beware". If someone would rather say "Hey, donate to my ministry, and I'll do a personal consultation with you", then that's more palatable. I hope today's Internet Evangelists are paying attention, because of all the TV preachers in the world, there's plenty of examples out there of how NOT to run your ministry. I really hope you are listening, if this applies to you…
At any rate, and I've said this before, anons are more than perfectly capable of practicing their own discernment. If you think PM is a fraud, then speak with your wallet, and your "unfollow" button. If you think Bill Mitchell is a "johnny-come-lately" to the most obvious military/POTUS/Cabal take-down in history, then feel free to hit up his twitter and speak your concerns.