>>6079913 lb

I was studying EQs in 2013 and pulled some of the USGS datasets for graphing also. Wasn't looking at depth, though. Didn't keep the data set, just the graphs resulting from the analysis. At the time I was trying to determine if there was a trend of EQs increasing in quantity and/or magnitude.

Question: Do you believe the declared EQ depth, or can it be explained away as an artifact of the way the data gets interpreted? For me that is an open question.

>>6080126

You are also aware, I am sure, that some EQ events that people feel locally or are reported on various sites are suppressed from the USGS website? So the USGS WILBER data may not be complete.

>>6080159

>>6080190

>>6080266

>>6080385

Hunter becomes hunted.

Happy hunting.

>>6080296

>>6080585 double kek

>>6080615

Alright anons, you've got the con, i'm going beddybye. (Like your Jupiter & Excalibur sets today).