Supporting the CIA regime change operation in Venezuela should tell you all you need to know.
Pompeo didn't clean a thing in his time there, and Haspel? Please. No chance.
President Carter did much better with one term.
Never. Barr is 'ex-'CIA. He was complicit in covering up Reagan administration crimes, including Operation Condor fuckery and the tip of the iceberg that was iran-Contra (running arms to our dear enemy, and coordinating drug trafficking into the US for Nicaraguan pawns attempting to change a regime).
He's there to cover up all the SIS/CIA links. That is all.
Same reason neocon Pompeo was installed at CIA, then Haspel.
Both trustworthy to not do what Carter did. In other words, no cleaning house.
Meanwhile, POTUS supports the CIA regime change plot in Venezuela, and appoints the war criminal Abrams, another Reagan/CIA pawn.
Not what it's been claimed to be. There to ensure the fallout is limited, and that it never reaches SIS activity that laid the groundwork for the 'Russiagate' distraction.
Also not coincidence that Q claimed Reagan to be an 'outsider', likening POTUS to him and JFK.
Reagan was no JFK. He was surrounded by CIA minions, and they got him into office to ensure Carter would be ousted.
Carter, who Actually tried to clean out CIA.
Reagan signed NSC3, handing CIA man GHWB a parallel executive (Special Situation Group) to operate with presidential authorization.
https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/sites/default/files/archives/reference/scanned-nsdds/nsdd3.pdf
Reagan was not a patriot. He was not a hero.
Ask yourself why that disinformation was "necessary". Why was it important to lie to anons, and then watch them regurgitate the revisionist 'history' all over this board and elsewhere?
Sauce on CIA activity all around Reagan's installment:
https://consortiumnews.com/archive/xfile.html
Most anons avoid inconvenient facts that threaten the validity of the narrative.
Smarter questions should be asked regarding why lies of this nature were in any way justified.
Post-Nixon CIA-removal and Pentagon Papers release muddied the water for ex-Warren Commission CIA-proxy Ford.
And Reagan wasn't properly prepared by CIA to mount an acceptable challenge yet.
Four years later, though…
Anons are focused on Rachel Chandler type bullshit, typically, so they don't bother to corroborate the claims.
Only those they're told to dig on.
Miss the bigger picture, consistently.
Read up on what 'controlled opposition' is, and how it works.
Claims he was 'shot' by a man whose family was close to GHWB, who lived down the road from the Bush compound in New Haven.
'Gun control' Brady Bill follows.
Nine months later, Reagan signs NSC3, effectively handing over executive authority to GHWB.
https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/sites/default/files/archives/reference/scanned-nsdds/nsdd3.pdf
Catch on, yet?
And try reading up on the CIA assets all around him, especially those involved in preventing Carter from attaining an 'October Surprise'.
https://consortiumnews.com/archive/xfile.html
Will do you some good.
Correct, anon. Reagan was a puppet.
Being VP fixed that for GHWB, though, didn't it?
Good reasoning. Keep it up.