>>6091423 (pb)
^^^^^ about Sudan, but it relates to the intervention angle
I can now think of four distinct reasons why the cabal would run the Rwandan genocide. I'll list them from short-term to long-term.
1) Gain effective control of DR Congo. One goal is to gain easier control of minerals and rare earth elements, like coltan. Another is to gain a large area where any sort of fuckery can be practiced without much hindrance. The central government is very weak, there is still fighting, and a patchwork of international organizations has a large run of the place.
2) Practice run for destabilizing national sovereignty via a refugee crisis. This is exactly what happened in DRC after the Rwandan genocide. After the genocide was allowed to run its course, the world's attention was directed to Rwanda, and few saw that the immediate target was DRC (even though refugees were IN DRC....)
3) Have a massive humanitarian failure that allows "do-gooders" to step in and tell us how to get it right "next time". The "official story" promulgated most especially by Samantha Power, is that the US and the "world" didn't realize what was happening and were too passive and hesitant. So "next time" the world needs to step in with a vast array of "humanitarian" NGO's, international quasi-governmental bodies, and internationalized military forces. And this is pretty much what they have pushed.
4) Have a trial run of a mass-death scenario, where the "savior" is actually getting support from the very people who actually instigated the mass death. See if this can result in a significant remaking of society. On my reading, there are signs that this has been partially "successful" in Rwanda. On a strictly material level, it is probably a better place to live than before 1994, but forget about free speech.
I guess I could also add:
5) Reiterate the ABSOLUTE IRRATIONALITY AND DANGER of any sort of ethnic/national attachment. This can lead to GENOCIDE. On some level, this was part of the "message" of the Shicklgruber Slaughter, but part of the point of that was to create the charge of "anti-Semitism" as a shield behind which even the worst evil can be hidden. But now we have a genocide involving "Hutus" and "Tutsis". Samantha Power, evil bitch that she is, claims that Wesley Clark said officers at the Pentagon were asking: "Is it Hutu and Tutsi or Tutu and Hutsi?" But that is just part of the plot. Most normal people around the world didn't have the SLIGHTEST idea of the differences between these groups and still don't. They will likely respond by thinking it is RIDICULOUS and EVIL to slaughter people because they are Hutus or Tutsi or whatever. Who cares? And the point is get people to think that ANYONE who cares in ANY WAY about their family background or heritage or ethnicity or nation or religion as being of some PARTICULAR importance is one step away from GENOCIDE! They want us to think we are all EXACTLY THE SAME IN EVERY WAY (except insofar as we are allowed to choose from a preset menu of parameters... ANY one of 53 genders... ) and we should SUBMIT to our ENLIGHTENED MASTERS who only want what is best for us. Hail Satan!
(Don't really hail Satan. That's a joke...)