Anonymous ID: 040df4 April 8, 2019, 6:03 p.m. No.6102753   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6102627

>Real kids in real trouble.

 

Yes, sing me the swan song of your people. Deflect! Think of the children! I cant stop thinking of them, it's a daily nightmare playing in my head. You're obstructing that research.

 

This is exactly why egos like yours must be checked. How about you fight the urge to post again? Stop wasting bread. Welcome to 8chan newfriend.

Anonymous ID: 040df4 April 9, 2019, 7:31 a.m. No.6107887   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7915

>>6107686

I think it acts as a red herring to the uninitiated. It's likely that the story of Horus is yet another way to pass down mystery knowledge without alerting the plebs.

 

When I think of Obelisks, the first thing that comes to mind is ley lines. I understand that not everyone believes in the significance of ley lines but we must understand that the occult world does care about them.

 

A good example would be the "Center of The Universe" in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Masquerading as a memorial for those who died in the riots, there is a giant pillar that sure does resemble an obelisk. What a coincidence it is, that Tulsa seems to have a major ley line running through it.

 

I don't know the exact significance of obelisks. It seems like the occult world believes they hold powerful energy. Maybe they're just markers for human trafficking routes. I honestly don't know.

Anonymous ID: 040df4 April 10, 2019, 9 a.m. No.6121314   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6120398

>It was a 16-feet-tall conical object worshiped as the โ€œSimulacrum of Cybeleโ€ and weighed several hundred tons.

 

How did they ever move something that big? Does this meteorite possibly have any connection to the black stone in the Kaaba at Mecca? Apparently that tiny black stone used to be fairly large. In the 17th century it was purported to be 4 x 4 ft. I vaguely remember someone posting a connection between Astarte and Mecca a few breads back. Astarte seems similar to Cybele. Might be worth looking into.

Anonymous ID: 040df4 April 10, 2019, 6:48 p.m. No.6128865   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9425 >>9993 >>4425

>>6126401

I don't speak for everyone obviously. Thomas was either intentionally or unintentionally sliding the entire thread. His posts acted as a slide. He seems genuine at times but I have no way of knowing that for sure. To make matters worse, he was posting 10 - 20 consecutive posts with the content consisting of wikipedia articles, pictures, and "insider knowledge" drops with no real rhyme or reason. Some of it was relevant information but the vast majority of it was leap frogging from one fleeting idea to another. It was a waste of bread and it makes it more difficult to actually find the content you're looking for. Thomas' ID was changing daily, sometimes multiple times in day. This makes filtering him a chore. He has shown a complete disregard to even bother learning the basics of 8chan. Thomas' thread was bumplocked by the board owner. That should tell you everything you need to know. He simply needs to lurk moar if he's honestly here to help.

 

I don't necessarily disagree with anything I can glean from Thomas' sporadic writing. In past breads there were a variety of theories explored.

The baker has recently been on a Fomenko kick, so that's probably why you see more forged history related posts. I happen to find those theories interesting. But we were talking about much more than just a single theory in past breads. I personally enjoy the electric universe posts and Saturn vs. Jupiter posts too, along with many others.

 

I wouldn't have to explain any of that to someone that has actually read all the breads. I'm not trying to bully Thomas and I didn't make up the rules. I don't even like speaking up that often, there are much smarter people in the room than me. I only feel like I can speak on the matter because the chans have been my second home for years. Rules are important on a board like this. It's just that simple. It's not personal.

Anonymous ID: 040df4 April 10, 2019, 7:41 p.m. No.6129644   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6129425

Yes! Let your hate pour into me!

 

This doesn't seem like a productive or relevant exchange for this thread. Are you obstructing research? Seems pretty selfish. Keep it in the bumplocked thread, you animals.

Anonymous ID: 040df4 April 11, 2019, 5:39 a.m. No.6134368   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4775

>>6131153

Shhh, we'll pretend last night's ebake never happened. lol

 

>>6131631

If someone had presented Fomenko's ideas to me 5 years ago, I would've scoffed at the whole thing.

 

>Honestly? I want him to be wrong.

 

Exactly! That's how I know it must hold some truth to it. I don't want this theory to be true, yet it resonates with me.