Anonymous ID: f5db2d April 8, 2019, 12:03 p.m. No.6098917   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6098833

 

Big news, huh? I'm sure that'll keep anons from noticing the latest establishment proxy promoted in this administration.

 

Those Bushies need cover, y'know.

Anonymous ID: f5db2d April 8, 2019, 12:05 p.m. No.6098958   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6098911

 

Great plan. Appoint a CIA tool to AG so he can cover up CIA & SIS involvement in the 'Russiagate' distraction, just like he was complicit in covering up Reagan administration crimes.

 

Anons are so impressionable, it's startling.

Anonymous ID: f5db2d April 8, 2019, 12:12 p.m. No.6099034   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9241

>>6098880

 

Well said.

 

Most people on here haven't graduated high school yet. They think it's cool.

 

That's why they fall for 'Reagan the hero' revisionism, and can't tell establishment media (Fox) from independent media.

 

No education of history = morons ripe for the picking. Hence the complete lack of rational thought, and the push for memes that can be understood by the functional illiterates.

Anonymous ID: f5db2d April 8, 2019, 12:17 p.m. No.6099103   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9271

>>6099002

 

You mean to say folks who point out contradictions to the narrative you follow like sycophants must, just must be paid to point out stupidity.

 

Who told you that, again? Was it your invisible 'friend'?

 

"Anonymous sources are not to be trusted - except this one."

Anonymous ID: f5db2d April 8, 2019, 12:35 p.m. No.6099317   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9341

>>6099172

 

..does Not mean 'surround yourself with them'.

 

Come on. Grow up. We can all count the establishment proxies, CFR pawns, neocons from the Reagan and Bush administrations, and MIC cheerleaders getting cushy, influential positions under POTUS - not that Anyone is digging those names.

Anonymous ID: f5db2d April 8, 2019, 12:42 p.m. No.6099385   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6099341

 

I'll take from your childish reply that you have no one, single, solitary bit of evidence to suggest anyone bothered to 'dig' on Barr, his past CIA employment, or his role in the Reagan administration covering up Operation Condor bullshit and Iran-Contra crimes.

 

I've seen a lot of posts since early last year, and I haven't seen more than a handful looking critically at POTUS's many establishment appointments.

 

Got one to share?

Anonymous ID: f5db2d April 8, 2019, 12:50 p.m. No.6099482   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9497

>>6099399

 

But…but…POTUS went after Omar for daring to say the obvious, rather than point out how much influence foreign interests have over our politicians. Why do that?

 

And Pompeo told AIPAC that "anti-Zionism is antisemitism." Surely he can't be wrong.

 

https://www.timesofisrael.com/pompeo-at-aipac-says-anti-zionism-is-anti-semitism/

Anonymous ID: f5db2d April 8, 2019, 12:56 p.m. No.6099562   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9595 >>9626

>>6099278

 

Lies, you say? Do tell, child. Which lie? That Fox is establishment media? Were you born yesterday? Do you typically trust Murdoch properties run for decades by CFR minions (Ailes)? How about controlled opposition that covers "Benghazi" for months never to mention CIA arms running from there into Syria to foment war?

 

Are you predisposed to consuming corporate propaganda brought to you with a red tie by your favorite establishment proxy? You should stop. It makes you look foolish.

Anonymous ID: f5db2d April 8, 2019, 1 p.m. No.6099607   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6099497

 

Blatant and in our faces. Wonder why Pompeo didn't clean a thing while he was at CIA?

 

People rip Carter, but at least he attempted to clean house. POTUS is hiring "ex" CIA tools, and anons think they're "our guy".

Anonymous ID: f5db2d April 8, 2019, 1:03 p.m. No.6099634   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6099595

 

Same reason why Gowdy isn't to be trusted. Coincidence we were told to.

 

He definitely saw enough to know as well as we did since the 2012 DIA doc leak that CIA was coordinating arms trafficking out of Benghazi to Syria via Gulf state proxies.

 

Anyone recall the Marc Turi case?