>>7002846

From QResearch >>7002684

Bitcoin might finally be making an entrance into the conversation about The Plan. At least in an introductory way. I don't think Trump has ever mentioned Bitcoin before, has he? Certainly Q hasn't.

This is complex and won't get many eyes. It's probably is better suited to an academic paper than an 8Chan post, but here goes…

The initial reference by the President to Bitcoin is on its face unfavorable. He says, "I am not a fan of Bitcoin and other Cryptocurrencies, which are not money, and whose value is highly volatile and based on thin air."

Since when do Anons take any utterance at face value.

I think it's worth keeping in mind that the President has made seemingly contradictory statements on many other things before, and always for good reason. The dollar should be stronger. The dollar should be weaker. The gold standard is a good thing. Trump doesn't really support a gold standard (according to Trump representative).

And apparently, the President "doesn't personally believe in UFOs." Cough, cough.

Disinfo really is necessary.

Now I'm not saying that we can really know what role Bitcoin has to play in The Plan, if any. However there are many indications it does actually have SOME role to play.

I find it especially interesting that Trump's apparent critique of Bitcoin in his tweet that it's "based on thin air" echoes the critiques of the worst of the Cabal, like Jamie Dimon and others. Further, it's always worth considering whether something is GOOD FOR US based on how the Cabal reacts to it, and one thing is for sure, the Cabal has HATED Bitcoin from the beginning. So you have to ask why. Yes, certain Cabal agents, like John McAfee, have expressed loud support of Bitcoin, but these voices have mainly been at the margins, preaching to the choir (Internet back-channel conversations about crypto).

To me, saying that Bitcoin is "based on thin air" is so patently misguided as a statement that I have to believe that Trump is trolling the Cabal (and perhaps also warning patriots of very stormy seas ahead). Trump is so much smarter than this simple statement, as we all understand very well. We are watching a stable genius playing multi-dimensional chess. He knows that real money is not intrinsically backed by anything except its exceptional money-ness.

Cont'd…

>>7002893

cont'd from above…

The best money always has been and always will be a perfect ledger for real wealth and nothing more. For a long time, gold was the closest thing we had to being the perfect money. But here is the hardest thing people will have to understand in order to break the brainwashing about money itself: in fact, ANY QUALITY OTHER THAN a currency's qualities as a "perfect money" DETRACTS from its perfect money-ness. Such as intrinsic "commodity" value. Such as silver. Which is also so effective in many ways as money, as exhibited through history, but not quite perfect enough, especially when you consider that it has critical commodity applications, in electronics for example. Mobile phones depend on silver. So when a money is also a critical commodity to our survival, does that make it better or worse as money? We have always been told that a money's corresponding value in OTHER ways (its commodity value) is something that increases the money's effectiveness as money. Yes, these commodity qualities increase its DESIRABILITY as a NECESSITY, in and of itself, that is certain. But what if this only reinforces THE PEOPLE'S willingness to back the money, but doesn't actually improve the money's effectiveness as a perfect money – that is if something could be perfect money in all other ways without being something we otherwise needed in our lives, THE PEOPLE could still decide between themselves (the hive mind) that this money shall be the ultimate measure of our wealth.

This part is hard to understand. It's an abstraction. But money itself is an abstraction. Of our wealth. We have to expand our thinking and see it with new eyes. I'm arguing this: being a critical commodity to our lives improves the effectiveness of something as money only to a degree, because at what point does something become TOO NECESSARY and thereby FAIL as money? For example, if silver were to become important to zero point energy, and therefore every single accessible ounce on the planet were regarded as something far, far too valuable to be tied up in coinage or vaults, then suddenly its commodity value actually detracts from its perfect money-ness. So you see something can be TOO BACKED BY SOMETHING OTHER THAN AIR, and thereby FAIL as money. Similarly, barrels of wheat, which do indeed rot but which are necessary to prevent famine, have been used historically as money but which actually fail as perfect money, not only because they rot, but because WE EAT THEM. You should not eat your money. That DETRACTS from the ability of the wheat to serve as a PERFECT LEDGER of real wealth, measuring what you have earned, spent or saved. As soon as your money is being consumed, in ANY QUANTITY, either by eating it or using it for its commodity value in electronics, it lessens its value as money. How do you measure the welath of the world when portions of it fluctuate in quantity because of the money's own intrinsic value in OTHER respects OTHER THAN its ability to function perfectly as money?

Bitcoin is not backed by thin-air. Bitcoin is backed up by its miraculous perfection as an un-hackable virtual (online) ledger for real wealth and nothing more. That's all it offers, and that's all it should offer, and no other money has ever offered that, so it's not surprising it's hard for us to fully understand. Bitcoin can't be counterfeited (like gold), and it can't be printed to infinity by a corrupt bank or government (like digital national fiat currencies). That is the ONLY thing we really want for our money, which is something WE THE PEOPLE give its power and value to, as a measure not of the intrinsic commodity value in the money itself but as its measure of what we all agree is your real wealth, my real wealth, a corporation's real wealth, a country's real wealth. That is the only thing money is measuring, and Bitcoin does that better than any money in history, at least in a digital world. And then it must be something which we can trade easily between ourselves, and while gold worked well in ancient times and today still works for big countries dealing in tons of gold, we all recognize that it doesn't work well as between individuals on a day to day basis.

Cont'd…

>>7002902

cont'd from above…

So gold is still amazing, and we will probably go to some gold standard, as it does things no other money does (with limited if any commodity applications THAT WE KNOW OF). In the real, physical, non-virtual world, gold is still king of the moneys. Paper dollar bills BACKED BY A RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT is the best money for transacting day to day between people in real life. But both gold and paper dollar bills have serious handicaps that are cured by Bitcoin.

Honestly I'm not saying buy Bitcoin. In fact, I would say the President might be warning there is trouble ahead for Bitcoin, at least in terms of it's listed price. But I don't take that statement as a categorical nail in the coffin for Bitcoin's future. Personally, I still believe Bitcoin has some important role to play, after the rest totally toxic, corrupted cryptocurrency environment has been cleansed of its almost total infiltration by the Cabal. The Cabal has spent 10 years infiltrating and corrupting the cryptocurrency space in order to bring down Bitcoin. That's the threat Bitcoin really poses to [them]. Today I have no idea what the price of Bitcoin should be, nor what it will be, nor when it might reveal itself as part of the Plan.

Or it won't. In either event, humanity is being freed, and that's the only payoff I want anyhow.

END