Anonymous ID: 93894b April 25, 2019, 4:30 p.m. No.6314682   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9160

>>6244128

that maybe proves to be 20/20 100% in this case. But dont lose sight of the fact that the genie cant go back in da bottle.

 

last time it was attempted:

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/georgeleef/2014/12/09/protecting-us-from-a-terrorist-who-made-pure-silver-coins-the-bernard-von-nothaus-case/

Anonymous ID: 93894b May 23, 2019, 5:12 p.m. No.6570860   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2494

>>6569673

1 of the few economic studies of bitcoin regulation published in the peer-reviewed world modeled a situation where banks regardless of stance they come to adopt will remain silent on regulations b/c it may signal to regulators that may not be bothering with the matter that banks give the tech credence and the hi silent dragging inevatibility out as long as possible to milk their position for what its worth in that remaining time