lawfag here - anons this case is another nothing burger publicized to hurt POTUS - it is directly relatred to the case last year which already made this ruling
>>6101529 Judge Richard Seeborg in San Francisco, halts Trump Admin policy sending asylum seekers back
it involves asylum seekers that do NOT cross at POE - POTUS is sending them back which is NOT legal under current law and court already ruled that - its not a bog deal - see below past notable
here is link to current ruling for sauce
file:///C:/Users/Optiplex%20390/Desktop/Order-Granting-Preliminary-Injunction-Doc-99.pdf
here is original analysis which STANDS no changes
lawfag here
on the court ruling about asylum for caravan and other illegals
dont be worred or deceived anons
this is not what you think
the judge's ruling is CORRECT and very limited
DOJ/POTUS had to know exactly what would happen and did this intentionally and expected this result
The law in question makes it 100% clear that aliens may apply for asylum "…whether or not at a designated port of arrival" the reason for this is simple - the prupose of asylum is to escape - when one is escaling one does not seek a designated POA! duh
So what does POTUS do? Passes a rule saying asylum seekers MUST present themselves at an officlal POA - duh again - so what remains then?
the key - NOTHING in the ruling stops the border patrol/ICE/military from STOPPING all persons from entry - once they are stopped then they may apply for asylum - where? at an approved POE!!
keks
remember what POTUS said? "they are not getting in" that STANDS
ruling pdf
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5194180-11-19-18-East-Bay-Sanctuary-Order.html