Anonymous ID: c05c30 April 8, 2019, 8:10 p.m. No.6104332   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6104062

lawfag reported on this a few breads back.

repeat for u

 

this case is another nothing burger publicized to hurt POTUS - it is directly relatred to the case last year which already made this ruling

 

Judge Richard Seeborg in San Francisco, halts Trump Admin policy sending asylum seekers back

 

it involves asylum seekers that do NOT cross at POE - POTUS is sending them back which is NOT legal under current law and court already ruled that - its not a bog deal - see below past content

 

here is link to current ruling for proof

 

file:///C:/Users/Optiplex%20390/Desktop/Order-Granting-Preliminary-Injunction-Doc-99.pdf

 

here is original analysis which STANDS no changes.

 

 

on the court ruling about asylum for caravan and other illegals

 

dont be worred or deceived by fake news

 

this is not what you think

 

the judge's ruling is CORRECT and very limited

 

DOJ/POTUS had to know exactly what would happen and did this intentionally and expected this result

 

The law in question makes it 100% clear that aliens may apply for asylum "…whether or not at a designated port of arrival" the reason for this is simple - the prupose of asylum is to escape - when one is escaling one does not seek a designated POA! duh

 

So what does POTUS do? Passes a rule saying asylum seekers MUST present themselves at an officlal POA - duh again - so what remains then?

 

the key - NOTHING in the ruling stops the border patrol/ICE/military from STOPPING all persons from entry - once they are stopped then they may apply for asylum - where? at an approved POE!!