BAKER BAKER
Proposing adding the following to notable bread:
The number of sealed filings also doesn't mean they are indictments. Could be sealed orders.
I'll try to dig it up, but I found a piece of federal law detailing a requirement that federal authorities file sealed reports detailing Nat Sec info provided to state and local authorities. I believe it was pertaining to grand juries…
Let me try to find it, because a distribution of cases outside of DC may trigger a lot of these sort of filings, and keeps the swamp in the dark.
Found it:
https://
www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_6
>(6) Sealed Records. Records, orders, and subpoenas relating to grand-jury proceedings must be kept under seal to the extent and as long as necessary to prevent the unauthorized disclosure of a matter occurring before a grand jury.
Further:
>(ii) Within a reasonable time after disclosure is made underRule 6(e)(3)(D), an attorney for the government must file, under seal, a notice with the court in the district where the grand jury convened stating that such information was disclosed and the departments, agencies, or entities to which the disclosure was made
That's exactly what I'm saying. The sealed court docs were seeing are artifacts of their work - records, orders, and hopefully indictments.
Revealing a lot of info to grand juries would produce a ton of these sort of filings.
Hopefully some lawyerfag can confirm. Not my wheelhouse.
He did. Could definitely be a double meaning.
If the baker would be so kind as to add my previous post referencing the section of law to notable post for next bread, it would be good to make sure this gets exposure.
It's the more likely scenario than 13k indictments alone. These are the filings that will get us to indictments.
Not a lawyerfag, but UMCJ is drastically different than civillian court system, so I doubt there would be overlap.
I would imagine disclosures of MI (military intelligence) would trigger the requisite sealed disclosure filings though.
That could be what Q meant wrt to his posts about MI and using the military…
Correct, UCMJ doesn't appear to have a mechanism for a "grand jury" so much as the option of a regular jury during courts martial (i.e. not simply decided by a judge).
Again, not a lawyerfag so I'm not 100% on the mechanics of military justice.
I don't think we're at a point where POTUS could make a compelling case, particularly to the public, that were in a civil war or that the civil courts are not functioning.
Now, releasing an HRC video that causes unrest…you might be able to do it after that.
To be clear, I also don't think anything done under ex parte Milligan case law by the military justice system would appear in the civil court system records - which is the source of the sealed record count.
Wonder if the civillian grand juries could transfer their evidence to UCMJ system in the event of unrest though…do all the work before hand, trigger unrest with HRC video (that heavily implicates her in criminality), then move to military justice system for actual justice to take place.
They haven't done much recently. It would be bad optics for Trump at this point since they've been calling him a dictator forever now.
If you ended up triggering those groups into action, then yes. Like maybe an HRC video shitting on minorities, talking about MS13 hits, etc. Antifa would just come along for the ride to break shit.
Saw no mention of "grand jury" or "jury" in it. There doesn't seem to be an exact analog to the civilian system.
The "convening authority" is more like a prosecutor - deciding what cases go to courts martial.
In any case, again, the sealed records we are seeing are in a civillian court legal system as of right now, not the military, which was my point anyway. We don't have any view into the UCMJ to my knowledge.
Certainly possible, but I'm going with Occam's Razor, not Dilleys source whose track record I know nothing about.
Q has been saying so much is open source. Let's use logic and open source materials to get to a reasonable conclusion that doesn't end with bad optics for Trump.
We know there are a ton of sealed civillian court records.
We know how those can be generated.
We know they're going on throughout the country in many jurisdictions.
We know they are being unsealed as fast as they are being produced.
We know Sessions has someone(s?) outside DC but with DoJ experience (not necessarily still part of it) investigating.
We can't get a glimpse into non-civillian courts to my knowledge, so anything about action there is speculation.