Morning anons!
Good to see some light being about :-) And good that some are seeing the bigger picture..
>The realm of which you speak is there, here, all around us but we cannot see it.
For now ;-)
Morning anons!
Good to see some light being about :-) And good that some are seeing the bigger picture..
>The realm of which you speak is there, here, all around us but we cannot see it.
For now ;-)
Why do you think you are here anon? YOU can help with this! YOU can help by red-pilling=informing those around you of what is happening.
>most of people are going to be put into hospital for feeling like sheep
Kinda on you anon if this happens to your friends or not…WE have a responsibility here. Somehow, we are more awake to this reality than most and it is incumbent upon us to inform…and continue to learn and discern…
Hey lets replace "turn and burn" with "learn and discern" :-)
Sympathy for the devil..literally…Kissinger is NOT a good man…just sayin'
That would be the batter anon…
WE need to write and submit a draft…have proposed this to the war room and their was an anon on yesterday am that had begun a draft…I would suggest WE do this…WE know what this needs to look like…
Groupchatanons or docuemtsharinganons…is there a way to do this and iterate a doc?
Proposal
To the anons of 4 and 8 chan
Concerning the Internet Bill of Rights
Anon’s, who is the best group of people to right a new internet bill of rights? Congress? The federal communications commission?
I would propose we write and submit a draft of a new internet bill of rights. It could be SIMPLE and mimic the US Bill of Rights. Is there a way a document could be started and submitted for anon approval or a document started that we could all work on? Surely there is document sharing software that we could use. Further, there are legalanons that lurk here and could suggest and their are governmentanons that could also guide us.
Have we forgotten how to play? Lets show Q we have not! Lets lead.
-we have the right to free speech. Any public social media or other online platform has to ensure that no undo censorship will occur….
-private companies can set up social platforms but cannot restrict free speech…
-etc…
Follow the planefag posting format as plane is important…but so is call sign mapping and TYPE of plane…
>"We" are not lawyers, and attempts to do so result in discussion that is pointless
Disagree with your logic anon..no we are not lawyers. Have you met many lawyers? We have the skills to write and submit A DRAFT which could then be taken by lawyers and modified..
BUT LETS NOT LEAVE THE INTENT AND MEAT OF THE QUESTION TO SOME ATTORNEY…
Kinda what got us all here in the first place..TURNING OVER OUR POWER…
Agree it will be a VERY large number (2%-6%) and we all should be thinking about what comes next…it will impact local and it will be somewhat devastating to local and state governments…might dictate marshal law, etc…has to happen…
SEALS per crumbs? Watch for a turn toward Iran :-)
Grandpa meme ROTFL! Future proves past! kek!
Id. say the Mueller/Seychelles info plus now a deal in the wind would be water'ish…
Baker..if worthy…can we get this in the notables so it gets some war room thinking?
Wow..I love you guys..no homo..
-foreigners to GITMO
-US in US
-indictments spread around states to circumvent federal pardons
Secret grand juries in districts where indictments are filed…hmmm..
So if I understand this right..if something is filed in the Southern District of Texas then the GJ would have to have been impanelled in that District..correct? Could it have been a military GJ? Could military action cross to civilian indictments?
Yea..lets wait for the MSM to save us…WE have to save OURSELVES..just sayin'
no dig a waste…now you know something of the Mexican postal system :-)
What I am reading…like 4 guys with "soft weapons"=baseball bats have apparently siezed control of the Iran embassy…they are pro-UK shiites..whatever that means..
THIS IS FUCKING WEIRD AND STINKS…sure you smell it too…
Didn't recent EO amend some things in the UCOMJ? Just sayin'…
Perhaps amendments allow cross overs? That was the way I read it. Cannot remember the phrase but something like "interested parties" can be assembled to direct Military grand juries..so civilian authorities over military in certain instances…
Surely someone on here with more insight…but looked like building a bridge to me…hmmm..perhaps another crumb tie in?
Love you guys!
He would have to declare cabal a "hostile army"..does this tie in with EO which changed some things in the UCOMJ?
BAKER…LOTS OF GOOD DISCUSSION IN HERE ON..
-indictments
-military over civilian law
-theories
Lets preserve!
Ty! Interesting and great work..ty for your diligence here!
>One of the most critical aspects of this Awakening is to understand that the PEOPLE CAN & MUST take back control of the apparatus of lawmaking
THIS!
the dissonance around Snowden will require a bunch of redpilling…