>>6108374 lb

We're thinking along the same lines.

Stepped away to brush my teeth and an possible answer, for consideration by physicsanons, popped into muh mind.

Suppose there are two widely spaced transmitters.

Suppose they transmit a signal of equivalent power, on the same frequency, aiming at a specific point on earth.

Let's say that target zone is Mayotte.

Wait – suppose the frequency is just every so slightly detuned, such that the two converging signals beat?

(Anons familiar with the phenomenon of beating? Radio anons know it well, music/audio/acoustics anons may also be familiar – see sidebar below.)

Troughs destructively combine, peaks constructively combine, such that a new much lower frequency is observed in the target zone.

————————————-

sidebar on beats

In acoustics, a beat is an interference pattern between two sounds of slightly different frequencies, perceived as a periodic variation in volume whose rate is the difference of the two frequencies.

—————————————–

Anon, are you following me?

Without knowing the fundamental frequency transmitted, we can't say exactly how far detuned the two signals would have to have been, to produce what was observed at/from/in the vicinity of Mayotte.

If the power levels were strong enough, and the detuning was precise, I believe this phenomenon could have produced physical vibrations of significant magnitude … which conventional instruments would have interpreted as "seismic" since that's the paradigm surrounding those types of sensors and recording instruments.

Really powerful physical vibrations converging on a particular spot …

Does anybody remember what Defense Secretary William Cohen said in 1997?

Full transcript here → http://archive.defense.gov/Transcripts/Transcript.aspx?TranscriptID=674

About 2/3 of the way down Cohen said,

"Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves."

Cohen was alluding to such a capability existing prior to 1997.

>>6108544

> came from the south and penetrates through the building

How do you know it "came from the south"?

How do you know it "penetrates through the building"?

What if it's generated within the building?

What if it came from above or below?

What if it's generated within a person's nervous system or cochlea in some unknown manner?

Stick with observable facts, sort out what are your inferences versus factual observations.

>>6108685

Wish I knew how to estimate that.

How would that calcul be done: look at the EQ resulting, then backtrack to estimate how much mass was moved through what distance? Then use physics formula to calculate the energy in joules based on mass, acceleration, velocity, distance?

Need a true physics anon, not just muh physics hobby.

Just a SWAG.

>>6108721

Have you read Maxwell's equations as he originally formulated stated them using quaternion algebra before they were gutted by transposition into a "modern" algebra? Certain terms simply disappeared in the reformulated equations. Those terms still have physical significance but are no longer calculated or used by (most) physicists.

>>6108726 Yes. You have accurately expressed what I suggested for consideration.

>>6108562

>We need to think about

> define 'unified'

Correct. Unified field theory? A unified theory of electromagnetism, per Maxwell's original equations.

Maybe take a look at

http://visualphysics.org/forum/topics/200-missing-quaternion-equations-maxwells-treatis-electromagnetism-edition-1

I'm not a mathfag either, but have done a ton of reading/research/study of work by mathfags/physicsfags.

It was the scalar component of Maxwell's equations that was lost by reformulation into "modern" algebraic notation. They assumed the scalar component simply cancelled each other out and simplified the equation by simply deleting these scalars. However there are some who assert the scalar component has physical significance. Hence Unified Field Theory.