>>6109220

Yes, no problem. Especially with it being related Q’s most recent drops. I don’t think Q intended for us to just sit back and ignore the attacks without some effort to counter the false narratives.

I made this change to the notable callout that should suffice.

The NOTABLES section will help you cut through the chaos and noise.

Notables aren‘t endorsements. Discern for yourself. The notion we can control anonymous posts is a huge leap. ANYONE can post, including our adversaries. If you want DIRT: Read the rest of this page, where the information in the notables and the real research is being attacked relentlessly. Some posts may appear wild and outlandish. We call these posts “slides” and obvious efforts to derail and distract. Notables have at least some level of curation, even if just dig requests or theories.

WWG1WGA

>>6109220

I make regular updates based on feedback from anons. It’s definitely intended for “tourists” and not intended to impact behavior the hard working anons here. If anything, I hoped it would allow anons to focus on productive work more. Our time is our most precious resource. Unless an anon wants to war with the shills, it’s enough of a pushback to ignore them by and large (unless fucking with notables, sowing division or misleading on current work)

Thanks anon

>>6109521

Sounds like another stealth bomber