>>6410158

-* he wanted revenge/payback at all the wealth he lost to the French in American liberation war, he lost a kingdom of wealth and land in the US.

-* I believe he wanted to monopolize the lineage, as in he wanted to make sure the anti-Christ is born from his side of the Merovingian bloodline

• • if you look how the emperor of Japan was treated after WWII, you will understand that both atomic bombs were dropped on Japan not just a satanic sacrifice but also to force the hand of the emperor back then, to relinquish his title of “divinity”. The French kings also held such a title = “le pouvoir divin” or “le droit divin” – they used to believe they had a divine right or a DIVINE POWER to RULE. So I think this is one of the things George III was after = he wanted to take that title away from the Bourbon lineage and pass it on the Windsor one. Crazy right? But anons are forgetting that these people are truly crazy and sick. It’s not important what we believe but it’s important what cabal believes in.

• • In Cabal ideology and belief system, there are specific objects that are important to them. I was recently told that the entire TRUE reason behind the Syrian war was the Cabal wanting to get their hands on a specific antic = old item, they NEED to use during the anti-Christ ritual. I also believe this is to be the case during the French revolution. I believe George III wanted to take by FORCE, via the freemasons, a specific important item used in rituals, which the Bourbon lineage had. Crazy, right?

But George III didn’t want to go all the way in and kill everyone. He would have done it on the spot and he would have also killed all the French aristocrats before they fled to other countries. Don’t forget, this is not just about the royal family. Aristocratic families also were blood related to the Bourbons. But with a magical wand, MOST, managed to flee France, some taking a part of their wealth with them; even Louis XVI brothers managed to flee…. Strange right? How could they flee so easily while they are as guilty and corrupt as Louis XVI and Marie-Antoinette were? And how come they could go out so easily, but the Holy Roman Empire’s army couldn’t get in no matter what to save Marie-Antoinette, the beloved little sister of Joseph II & Leopold II? Things don’t add up anons. Why wasn’t the king immediately executed? Why did the charge Marie-Antoinette with pedophilia and incest in order to justify her beheading? What was king charged with as crime? Strange isn’t it? An angry hungry mob would have immediately hanged both Louis XVI and Marie-Antoinette. We have seen this done many times through history. But not this time around. Why did they torture and interrogate everyone in the King and Queen’s entourage (the ones whom they managed to catch)? What information were trying to get?

And anons shouldn’t forget George III was no match to the combined forces of Russia, Spain and Holy Roman Empire, even if England was allied with Prussia back then. So George wasn’t an idiot. He already knew they were plenty of royal loyalists whom had connections and spies in England. Some even migrated there. Who was there, in England? A cousin to Louis XVII, one of his sisters? What happened to them? And mostly, what was Louis XVII ransom? Geroge III didn’t let go of Louis XVII just for the fun of it. Sure he was calculating his move military as well, he didn’t want a direct confrontation with the Holy Roman Empire = Louis XVII’s Uncles. But he was not going to let go that easily of the boy as well. So some sort of ransom was paid to convince King George III to send the kid to the US. What was that ransom? What was the worth of Louis XVII? Well, he was a king, and not just any king, he was a pure blood Merovingian Satanist king heir. So his ransom must be something terribly high, precious and valuable. Something like a very rare and important ritualistic relic, like a special dagger for example or maybe the Holy Grail…..etc….. the possibilities are endless. What I believe George III under estimated was the wealth, the expansion and the power of the network that the Bourbon already had in the States. Or maybe simply he had no choice; it was this or he goes into open war with 3 very powerful kings; which would have probably ended badly for England and himself.

>>6410192

What you may have uncovered anon may be a relative, a close relative to Louis XVII. Don’t forget, Louis XVII had 2 sisters.

8 – In the State of Oregon, there is a county called Dauphin ^^ what are the odds of that being a reference to Louis XVII? And just take a look at all the towns and places named after the Bourbons kings. That is one huge network of places and businesses and rails….. it’s impossible to manage this big of an economical empire while it’s owner is living under the watchful eye of its rival. If Louis XVII was under the supervision and control of George III, still living in England, it would be the Windsors whom are powerful and rich by controlling Bourbons wealth in the States. WWI and mostly WWII would have probably never took place as well. But no, that was not the case. The Bourbon already established network grew and became wealthier, they controlled all the rails and oils and banks etc. After almost 40 years, they even created the Federal Reserve, which has Bourbon/Payseur fingerprints all over it, not the Windsors. When princess Diana knew her life was in danger because of the queen and Charles, she came to the States where her “cousins” were. Thank you L anon for digging that connection. Just take a look at the pictures of Diana’s visit to the States back in the 90s and look whom are the “stars” whom were greeting her and meeting her. Most if not all are now what we call members of the red shoe clan ^^

Anon, I think you are up to something, but I don’t think it’s Louis XVII himself. I wonder if you are about to catch one of his sisters or maybe one of his cousins. Oh that would be terribly interesting. Don’t forget, the fleur de Lys is dominantly used by the Bourbons as their symbol, but it was also used by the Windsors line….just take a look at their coat of arms ^_~ it’s because they have mixed blood with the Bourbons. Elizabeth of York’s daughter did marry the French king. Diana Spencer (from French king lineage of Normandy = William the conqueror) did marry Charles….. You get my point? But please, whatever you do and dig, please, be careful.

I can go on and on. I can talk next about Napoleon and I can talk about the Tsar and how it’s all connected and I can go into Robespierre and about the rape of Louis XVII (no wonder he was paranoid) by his mother and by the revolutionaries which lead him to have this phobia and him wanting to hide and muddy the paper trail. Well, I’ve talked a lot didn’t I, I apologize, but I hope I made my case of why I strongly believe Louis XVII = Payseur and now = Lewis Cass. I didn’t jump into this bandwagon for fancy anons. Those are my arguments and I have plenty more from that comes, as I said, I didn’t even start with Napoleon Bonaparte . I hope Potus is reading this cause I’m hoping he will give us hint to link rapist Bill to Nelson Rockefeller, and I’m also curious to know where Albert Pike really fits in all of this. I still would like to know more about Killary and if she is connected to Pike or David Rockefeller.

Wishing anons a wonderful Saturday. God bless you all.