Anonymous ID: ef3e27 April 9, 2019, 3:42 p.m. No.6112759   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2776 >>2804 >>2823 >>2873 >>2895 >>3085

John Solomon

 

Sitting in the hot seat of a high-profile congressional hearing has a way of unmasking the mettle of any witness.

 

Attorney General William Barr showed us Tuesday, in his first testimony since the end of the Russia probe, that he's not big on emotion, animation or flashy presentations. Calm, scholarly and precise was his modus operandi, even as Democrats tried to lob a bomb or two his way.

 

But the even-keeled nature of his two-hours-plus performance shouldn't blind us to one momentous declaration he made to lawmakers.

 

Though it didn't happen on his watch, Barr told Congress he will investigate how the FBI came to conduct a counterintelligence investigation against Donald Trump, then the Republican nominee for president, starting in the summer of 2016.

We have known for more than a year now that the Department of Justice (DOJ) inspector general, Michael Horowitz, has been investigating whether the FBI or DOJ abused the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to secure a warrant to spy on Trump campaign adviser Carter Page less than three weeks from Election Day 2016.

 

But Barr made clear Tuesday that his review is distinct and more far-ranging than IG Horowitz's investigation. It goes back to the moment when a probe code-named Crossfire Hurricane was opened on July 31, 2016, by Trump-hating FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok.

 

That probe's goal was to determine whether Trump was colluding with Russia to hijack the election. And, very quickly, the FBI chose to use an opposition research project, funded by Trump rival Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party and written by British intelligence operative Christopher Steele, as key evidence - even though it was unverified at the time.

 

Special counsel Robert Mueller has settled the collusion issue, concluding (like House and Senate intelligence committee Republicans before him) that there was no Trump-Russia conspiracy.

 

But Barr used a question from Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-Ala.) to signal that he wants to go further than Mueller or the IG, to determine whether the counterintelligence probe was legit from the start.

(Article continued)

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/438136-the-single-sentence-russia-bombshell-that-attorney-general-barr-delivered?amp&__twitter_impression=true