>>6114006

Anyone ever able to determine what her HAM radio set-up was?

What kind of antenna did she have? Any pics? What was her range. Did she have a little better than average rig?

Jusf wonder if she was just receiving(instructions etc) or was she transmitting.

Saw an article about how a home-based HAM can extend their range using what is called Moon Bounce. The method was originally concocted, coincidentally, by the C_A to spy on Soviet microwave comms at their missile test areas.

She, being CIA, might have known how to Bounce.

>>6114238

Would make sense. Passively receive. But then how came she to be "on the radar" ?

Can't prove someone was receiving. Unless she somehow downloaded recordings of what she was receiving.

>>6114336

PS- but as Q says, repeatedly, these people are stupid.

"Hey Nellie. Is that you Nellie? Nellie Ohr. Got your ears on? C'mon?"

>>6114506

Traceable though, I would imagine, if using the method you describe.

Receiving is passive and undetectable. But if she was sending, I wouldn't think they would recommend that relay method.

The bounce merhod could keep her anonymous. And 5eyes have those REALlY BIG arrays in Oz that could pick up anything they want.

Except… they are stupid thinking we don't record what they receive in Oz.